netdev - Re: pull-request: mlx5-next 2023-01-24 V2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 8 Feb 2023 11:17:39 +0200
From:   Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull-request: mlx5-next 2023-01-24 V2

On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 02:03:30PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 15:52:59 -0400 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 04:38:41PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 10:58:56 -0400 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:  

<...>

> > > The simplest way forward would be to commit to when mlx5 will
> > > support redirects to xfrm tunnel via tc...  
> > 
> > He needs to fix the bugs he created and found first :)
> > 
> > As far as I'm concerned TC will stay on his list until it is done.
> 
> This is what I get for trusting a vendor :/

I'm speechless. I was very clear what is my implementation roadmap.

Are you saying that your want-now-tc-attitude is more important than
working HW (found when integrated with libreswan) and Steffen's request
to implement tunnel mode?

> 
> If you can't make a commitment

You got this commitment from two people already, but unfortunately
you refuse to listen.

Thanks