netdev - Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/9] sched: cpumask: improve on cpumask_local

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <167583001977.19489.3612592708687977676.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 08 Feb 2023 04:20:19 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, baohua@...nel.org,
        bsegall@...gle.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com, gal@...dia.com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, bristot@...hat.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
        mingo@...hat.com, jacob.e.keller@...el.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        jgg@...dia.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
        Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        leonro@...dia.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, mgorman@...e.de,
        peter@...jl.ca, peterz@...radead.org, linux@...musvillemoes.dk,
        saeedm@...dia.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, tariqt@...dia.com,
        ttoukan.linux@...il.com, tony.luck@...el.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/9] sched: cpumask: improve on cpumask_local_spread()
 locality

Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Fri, 20 Jan 2023 20:24:27 -0800 you wrote:
> cpumask_local_spread() currently checks local node for presence of i'th
> CPU, and then if it finds nothing makes a flat search among all non-local
> CPUs. We can do it better by checking CPUs per NUMA hops.
> 
> This has significant performance implications on NUMA machines, for example
> when using NUMA-aware allocated memory together with NUMA-aware IRQ
> affinity hints.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [1/9] lib/find: introduce find_nth_and_andnot_bit
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/43245117806f
  - [2/9] cpumask: introduce cpumask_nth_and_andnot
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/62f4386e564d
  - [3/9] sched: add sched_numa_find_nth_cpu()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/cd7f55359c90
  - [4/9] cpumask: improve on cpumask_local_spread() locality
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/406d394abfcd
  - [5/9] lib/cpumask: reorganize cpumask_local_spread() logic
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/b1beed72b8b7
  - [6/9] sched/topology: Introduce sched_numa_hop_mask()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/9feae65845f7
  - [7/9] sched/topology: Introduce for_each_numa_hop_mask()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/06ac01721f7d
  - [8/9] net/mlx5e: Improve remote NUMA preferences used for the IRQ affinity hints
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/2acda57736de
  - [9/9] lib/cpumask: update comment for cpumask_local_spread()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/2ac4980c57f5

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html