[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230209130224.76c7f357@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 13:02:24 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: duplicate patches in the bitmap tree
Hi all,
The following commits are also in the net-next tree as different commits
(but the same patches):
2386459394d2 ("lib/cpumask: update comment for cpumask_local_spread()")
a99b18849bc8 ("net/mlx5e: Improve remote NUMA preferences used for the IRQ affinity hints")
af547a927f9f ("sched/topology: Introduce for_each_numa_hop_mask()")
439829e1bfba ("sched/topology: Introduce sched_numa_hop_mask()")
c0d13fba970d ("lib/cpumask: reorganize cpumask_local_spread() logic")
8ec0ffa233ab ("cpumask: improve on cpumask_local_spread() locality")
6139966175ca ("sched: add sched_numa_find_nth_cpu()")
ded3cee7db80 ("cpumask: introduce cpumask_nth_and_andnot")
These are commits
2ac4980c57f5 ("lib/cpumask: update comment for cpumask_local_spread()")
2acda57736de ("net/mlx5e: Improve remote NUMA preferences used for the IRQ affinity hints")
06ac01721f7d ("sched/topology: Introduce for_each_numa_hop_mask()")
9feae65845f7 ("sched/topology: Introduce sched_numa_hop_mask()")
b1beed72b8b7 ("lib/cpumask: reorganize cpumask_local_spread() logic")
406d394abfcd ("cpumask: improve on cpumask_local_spread() locality")
cd7f55359c90 ("sched: add sched_numa_find_nth_cpu()")
62f4386e564d ("cpumask: introduce cpumask_nth_and_andnot")
in the net-next tree.
There are some slight differences (I got a conflict merging the bitmap
tree today), but the net-next series is newer than the bitmap tree one ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists