netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/3] can: esd_usb: Improved behavior on esd CAN_ERROR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230209193023.uyb2isvrrjguhtbc@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 9 Feb 2023 20:30:23 +0100
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     Frank Jungclaus <Frank.Jungclaus@....eu>
Cc:     Stefan Mätje <Stefan.Maetje@....eu>,
        "linux-can@...r.kernel.org" <linux-can@...r.kernel.org>,
        "wg@...ndegger.com" <wg@...ndegger.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr" <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] can: esd_usb: Improved behavior on esd CAN_ERROR_EXT
 event (2)

On 09.02.2023 19:00:54, Frank Jungclaus wrote:
> > Not taking this series, waiting for the reworked version.
> > 
> > Marc
> > 
> Marc, can I just send a reworked patch of [PATCH 2/3], let's say
> with subject [PATCH v2 2/3] as a reply to this thread or should I
> better resend the complete patch series as [PATCH v2 0/3] up to
> [PATCH v2 3/3]?

Just re-post the whole series. Complete series are easier to handle.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)