[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+aVQ38sJvuUd4HM@francesco-nb.int.toradex.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2023 20:04:35 +0100
From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
To: Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Bluetooth: hci_mrvl: Add serdev support for
88W8997
On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 10:52:43AM -0800, Luiz Augusto von Dentz wrote:
> Hi Francesco,
>
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 12:40 AM Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it> wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 08:43:51AM +0100, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> > > From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
> > >
> > > Add serdev support for the 88W8997 from NXP (previously Marvell). It includes
> > > support for changing the baud rate. The command to change the baud rate is
> > > taken from the user manual UM11483 Rev. 9 in section 7 (Bring-up of Bluetooth
> > > interfaces) from NXP.
> >
> > Just a gently ping on this series, patches 1,2 with DT binding changes
> > are reviewed/acked, patch 5 with the DTS change should just be on hold
> > till patches 1-4 are merged.
> >
> > No feedback on patches 4 (and 3), with the BT serdev driver code
> > changes, any plan on those?
>
> bots have detected errors on these changes
>From what I can understand from this point of view v2 is fine, the error
was in v1, if I'm wrong just let me know.
Said that I'll do the change you asked regarding __hci_cmd_sync_status
and send a v3.
Thanks,
Francesco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists