lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 10 Feb 2023 11:53:23 -0800
From:   Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
To:     Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com>
Cc:     marcel@...tmann.org, hackerzheng666@...il.com,
        alex000young@...il.com, johan.hedberg@...il.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: hci_core: Fix poential Use-after-Free bug in hci_remove_adv_monitor

Hi Zheng,

On Thu, Feb 9, 2023 at 8:11 PM Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com> wrote:
>
> In hci_remove_adv_monitor, if it gets into HCI_ADV_MONITOR_EXT_MSFT case,
> the function will free the monitor and print its handle after that.
>
> Fix it by switch the order.
>
> Fixes: 7cf5c2978f23 ("Bluetooth: hci_sync: Refactor remove Adv Monitor")
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com>
> ---
>  net/bluetooth/hci_core.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
> index b65c3aabcd53..db3352c60de6 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_core.c
> @@ -1980,9 +1980,9 @@ static int hci_remove_adv_monitor(struct hci_dev *hdev,
>                 goto free_monitor;
>
>         case HCI_ADV_MONITOR_EXT_MSFT:
> -               status = msft_remove_monitor(hdev, monitor);
>                 bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "%s remove monitor %d msft status %d",
>                            hdev->name, monitor->handle, status);
> +               status = msft_remove_monitor(hdev, monitor);

I wonder if it is not a good idea to move the logging inside
msft_remove_monitor?

>                 break;
>         }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>


-- 
Luiz Augusto von Dentz

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ