[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230213120203.7q36ntssetcrnwpa@skbuf>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 14:02:03 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>,
Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>,
Rui Sousa <rui.sousa@....com>,
Ferenc Fejes <ferenc.fejes@...csson.com>,
Pranavi Somisetty <pranavi.somisetty@....com>,
Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@....com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] selftests: forwarding: add a test for MAC
Merge layer
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 12:42:04PM +0100, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> Looks good to me. Is there any way to test this?
Only with driver level support implemented.
> I see mm support implemented for enetc and Felix.
Yes, those would be the Ethernet interfaces on the NXP LS1028A SoC.
That is all hardware I have access to.
> However, I only have access to Intel i225 NIC(s) which support frame
> preemption.
I suppose this patch set would need to be rebased to the current net-next
and adapted to the merged version of the ethtool API:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/cover/20220520011538.1098888-1-vinicius.gomes@intel.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists