netdev - Re: [PATCH v9 02/12] landlock: Allow filesystem layout changes for domains without such rule type

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e4008258-aad3-02d2-86fa-9c8118dcbd9e@digikod.net>
Date:   Tue, 14 Feb 2023 13:07:31 +0100
From:   Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
To:     "Konstantin Meskhidze (A)" <konstantin.meskhidze@...wei.com>
Cc:     willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, gnoack3000@...il.com,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, yusongping@...wei.com,
        artem.kuzin@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/12] landlock: Allow filesystem layout changes for
 domains without such rule type


On 14/02/2023 09:51, Konstantin Meskhidze (A) wrote:
> 
> 
> 2/10/2023 8:34 PM, Mickaël Salaün пишет:
>> Hi Konstantin,
>>
>> I think this patch series is almost ready. Here is a first batch of
>> review, I'll send more next week.
>>
>     Hi Mickaёl.
>     thnaks for the review.
> 
>>
>> I forgot to update the documentation. Can you please squash the
>> following patch into this one?
> 
>     No problem. I will squash.
>     Can I download this doc patch from your repo or I can use the diff below?

You can take the diff below.

>>
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
>> b/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
>> index 980558b879d6..fc2be89b423f 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
>> @@ -416,9 +416,9 @@ Current limitations
>>     Filesystem topology modification
>>     --------------------------------
>>
>> -As for file renaming and linking, a sandboxed thread cannot modify its
>> -filesystem topology, whether via :manpage:`mount(2)` or
>> -:manpage:`pivot_root(2)`.  However, :manpage:`chroot(2)` calls are not
>> denied.
>> +Threads sandboxed with filesystem restrictions cannot modify filesystem
>> +topology, whether via :manpage:`mount(2)` or :manpage:`pivot_root(2)`.
>> +However, :manpage:`chroot(2)` calls are not denied.
>>
>>     Special filesystems
>>     -------------------
>>
>>
>> On 16/01/2023 09:58, Konstantin Meskhidze wrote:
>>> From: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
>>>
>>> Allow mount point and root directory changes when there is no filesystem
>>> rule tied to the current Landlock domain.  This doesn't change anything
>>> for now because a domain must have at least a (filesystem) rule, but
>>> this will change when other rule types will come.  For instance, a
>>> domain only restricting the network should have no impact on filesystem
>>> restrictions.
>>>
>>> Add a new get_current_fs_domain() helper to quickly check filesystem
>>> rule existence for all filesystem LSM hooks.
>>>
>>> Remove unnecessary inlining.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes since v8:
>>> * Refactors get_handled_fs_accesses().
>>> * Adds landlock_get_raw_fs_access_mask() helper.
>>>
>> .