netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] l2tp: Avoid possible recursive deadlock in l2tp_tunnel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y+0Kvspkx4n2tWJQ@kernel-devel>
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 01:39:26 +0900
From:   Shigeru Yoshida <syoshida@...hat.com>
To:     Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>
Cc:     jchapman@...alix.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] l2tp: Avoid possible recursive deadlock in
 l2tp_tunnel_register()

Hi Guillaume,

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 06:09:33PM +0100, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 01:49:08AM +0900, Shigeru Yoshida wrote:
> > Just one more thing.  I created this patch based on the mainline linux
> > tree, but networking subsystem has own tree, net.  Is it preferable to
> > create a patch based on net tree for networking patches?
> 
> Yes. Networking fixes should be based on the "net" tree:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git

Thanks.  I'll use the "net" tree for v3 patch.

> For more details about posting patches to netdev, you can check
> Documentation/process/maintainer-netdev.rst
> 
> Or the online version:
> https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html

Got it.  I'll check that.

Anyway, I'll make v3 patch based on your feedback.

Thanks,
Shigeru

> 
> > Thanks,
> > Shigeru
> > 
> > > 
> > 
>