| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CA+QYu4rBbstxtewRVF2hSaVK1i3-CzifPnchfSaxe_EALhR1rA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 09:24:52 +0100
From: Bruno Goncalves <bgoncalv@...hat.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, alan.maguire@...cle.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
CKI Project <cki-project@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [6.2.0-rc7] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in hop_cmp+0x26/0x110
On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 15:32, Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 02:23:06PM +0100, Bruno Goncalves wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > recently when testing kernel with debug options set from net-next [1]
> > and bpf-next [2] the following call trace happens:
> >
> Hi Bruno,
>
> Thanks for report.
>
> This looks weird, because the hop_cmp() spent for 3 month in -next till
> now. Anyways, can you please share your NUMA configuration so I'll try
> to reproduce the bug locally? What 'numactl -H' outputs?
>
Here is the output:
numactl -H
available: 4 nodes (0-3)
node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
node 0 size: 32063 MB
node 0 free: 31610 MB
node 1 cpus: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
node 1 size: 32248 MB
node 1 free: 31909 MB
node 2 cpus: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55
node 2 size: 32248 MB
node 2 free: 31551 MB
node 3 cpus: 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63
node 3 size: 32239 MB
node 3 free: 31468 MB
node distances:
node 0 1 2 3
0: 10 21 31 21
1: 21 10 21 31
2: 31 21 10 21
3: 21 31 21 10
Bruno
> Thanks,
> Yury
>
> > [ 92.539335] be2net 0000:04:00.0: FW config: function_mode=0x10003,
> > function_caps=0x7
> > [ 92.559345] scsi host1: BC_356 : error in cmd completion: Subsystem
> > : 1 Opcode : 191 status(compl/extd)=2/30
> > [ 92.560448] scsi host1: BG_1597 : HBA error recovery not supported
> > [ 92.587657] be2net 0000:04:00.0: Max: txqs 16, rxqs 17, rss 16, eqs 16, vfs 0
> > [ 92.588471] be2net 0000:04:00.0: Max: uc-macs 30, mc-macs 64, vlans 64
> > [ 93.731235] be2net 0000:04:00.0: enabled 8 MSI-x vector(s) for NIC
> > [ 93.749741] ==================================================================
> > [ 93.750521] BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in hop_cmp+0x26/0x110
> > [ 93.751233] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888104719758 by task kworker/0:2/108
> > [ 93.751601]
> > [ 93.752087] CPU: 0 PID: 108 Comm: kworker/0:2 Tainted: G I
> > 6.2.0-rc7 #1
> > [ 93.752549] Hardware name: HP ProLiant BL460c Gen8, BIOS I31 11/02/2014
> > [ 93.752884] Workqueue: events work_for_cpu_fn
> > [ 93.753510] Call Trace:
> > [ 93.753687] <TASK>
> > [ 93.754215] dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x71
> > [ 93.754449] print_report+0x184/0x4b1
> > [ 93.754697] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xe8/0x160
> > [ 93.754972] ? hop_cmp+0x26/0x110
> > [ 93.755533] kasan_report+0xa5/0xe0
> > [ 93.756193] ? hop_cmp+0x26/0x110
> > [ 93.756767] ? __pfx_hop_cmp+0x10/0x10
> > [ 93.756990] ? hop_cmp+0x26/0x110
> > [ 93.757556] ? __pfx_hop_cmp+0x10/0x10
> > [ 93.757774] ? bsearch+0x53/0x80
> > [ 93.758838] ? sched_numa_find_nth_cpu+0x128/0x360
> > [ 93.759492] ? __pfx_sched_numa_find_nth_cpu+0x10/0x10
> > [ 93.759792] ? alloc_cpumask_var_node+0x38/0x60
> > [ 93.760419] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80
> > [ 93.761060] ? trace_kmalloc+0x33/0xf0
> > [ 93.761306] ? __kmalloc_node+0x76/0xc0
> > [ 93.761528] ? cpumask_local_spread+0x44/0xc0
> > [ 93.762192] ? be_setup_queues+0x13b/0x3c0 [be2net]
> > [ 93.762957] ? be_setup+0x663/0xa60 [be2net]
> > [ 93.763795] ? __pfx_be_setup+0x10/0x10 [be2net]
> > [ 93.764523] ? is_module_address+0x2b/0x50
> > [ 93.764744] ? is_module_address+0x2b/0x50
> > [ 93.764996] ? static_obj+0x6b/0x80
> > [ 93.765865] ? lockdep_init_map_type+0xcf/0x370
> > [ 93.766527] ? be_probe+0x825/0xcd0 [be2net]
> > [ 93.767224] ? __pfx_be_probe+0x10/0x10 [be2net]
> > [ 93.767932] ? preempt_count_sub+0xb7/0x100
> > [ 93.768181] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
> > [ 93.768450] ? __pfx_be_probe+0x10/0x10 [be2net]
> > [ 93.769162] ? local_pci_probe+0x77/0xc0
> > [ 93.769392] ? __pfx_local_pci_probe+0x10/0x10
> > [ 93.770007] ? work_for_cpu_fn+0x29/0x40
> > [ 93.770253] ? process_one_work+0x543/0xa20
> > [ 93.770490] ? __pfx_process_one_work+0x10/0x10
> > [ 93.797773pin_lock+0x10/0x10
> > [ 93.871656] ? __list_add_valid+0x3f/0x70
> > [ 93.871874] ? move_linked_works+0x103/0x140
> > [ 93.872487] ? worker_thread+0x364/0x630
> > [ 93.872704] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd8/0xf0
> > [ 93.872919] ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
> > [ 93.873513] ? kthread+0x17e/0x1b0
> > [ 93.874055] ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> > [ 93.874290] ? ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50
> > [ 93.874541] </TASK>
> > [ 93.874727]
> > [ 93.875188] Allocated by task 1:
> > [ 93.875733] kasan_save_stack+0x34/0x60
> > [ 93.875942] kasan_set_track+0x21/0x30
> > [ 93.876164] __kasan_kmalloc+0xa9/0xb0
> > [ 93.876373] __kmalloc+0x57/0xd0
> > [ 93.876918] sched_init_numa+0x21f/0x7e0
> > [ 93.877146] sched_init_smp+0x6d/0x113
> > [ 93.877358] kernel_init_freeable+0x2a3/0x4a0
> > [ 93.877993] kernel_init+0x18/0x160
> > [ 93.878592] ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50
> > [ 93.878811]
> > [ 93.879278] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888104719760
> > [ 93.879278] which belongs to the cache kmalloc-16 of size 16
> > [ 93.879926] The buggy address is located 8 bytes to the left of
> > [ 93.879926] 16-byte region [ffff888104719760, ffff888104719770)
> > [ 94.363686] flags: 0x17ffffc0000200(slab|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
> > [ 94.381131] raw: 0017ffffc0000200 ffff88810004c580 ffffea000400df50
> > ffffea0004165190
> > [ 94.381554] raw: 0000000000000000 00000000001c001c 00000001ffffffff
> > 0000000000000000
> > [ 94.381958] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
> > [ 94.382249]
> > [ 94.382710] Memory state around the buggy address:
> > [ 94.383319] ffff888104719600: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fa fb fc fc
> > fc fc fc fc
> > [ 94.384066] ffff888104719680: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc 00 00
> > fc fc fc fc
> > [ 94.384841] >ffff888104719700: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
> > 00 00 fc fc
> > [ 94.385573] ^
> > [ 94.386251] ffff888104719780: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
> > fc fc 00 00
> > [ 94.386989] ffff888104719800: fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc fc
> > fc fc fc fc
> > [ 94.387710] ==================================================================
> >
> > full console log:
> > https://s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/arr-cki-prod-datawarehouse-public/datawarehouse-public/3762562309/redhat:776235046/build_x86_64_redhat:776235046-x86_64-kernel-debug/tests/1/results_0001/job.01/recipes/13385613/tasks/5/logs/test_console.log
> >
> > test logs: https://datawarehouse.cki-project.org/kcidb/tests/7075911
> > cki issue tracker: https://datawarehouse.cki-project.org/issue/1896
> >
> > kernel config: https://s3.amazonaws.com/arr-cki-prod-trusted-artifacts/trusted-artifacts/776235046/build%20x86_64%20debug/3762562279/artifacts/kernel-bpf-next-redhat_776235046-x86_64-kernel-debug.config
> > kernel tarball:
> > https://s3.amazonaws.com/arr-cki-prod-trusted-artifacts/trusted-artifacts/776235046/publish%20x86_64%20debug/3762562289/artifacts/kernel-bpf-next-redhat_776235046-x86_64-kernel-debug.tar.gz
> >
> > The first commit we tested that we hit the problem is [3], but we
> > didn't bisect it to know what commit introduced the issue.
> >
> > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git
> > [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git
> > [3] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/commit/?id=0243d3dfe274832aa0a16214499c208122345173
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Bruno Goncalves
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists