[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+9xvtxdH1mT7tv5XXJjsDayRic=ecM30=qt_fnxuuc2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 14:03:50 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, kernel-team@...udflare.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] selftests/net: Interpret UDP_GRO cmsg data as an int value
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 1:43 PM Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com> wrote:
>
> Data passed to user-space with a (SOL_UDP, UDP_GRO) cmsg carries an
> int (see udp_cmsg_recv), not a u16 value, as strace confirms:
>
> recvmsg(8, {msg_name=...,
> msg_iov=[{iov_base="\0\0..."..., iov_len=96000}],
> msg_iovlen=1,
> msg_control=[{cmsg_len=20, <-- sizeof(cmsghdr) + 4
> cmsg_level=SOL_UDP,
> cmsg_type=0x68}], <-- UDP_GRO
> msg_controllen=24,
> msg_flags=0}, 0) = 11200
>
> Interpreting the data as an u16 value won't work on big-endian platforms.
> Since it is too late to back out of this API decision [1], fix the test.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230131174601.203127-1-jakub@cloudflare.com/
>
> Fixes: 3327a9c46352 ("selftests: add functionals test for UDP GRO")
> Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso_bench_rx.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso_bench_rx.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso_bench_rx.c
> index 4058c7451e70..f35a924d4a30 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso_bench_rx.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgso_bench_rx.c
> @@ -214,11 +214,10 @@ static void do_verify_udp(const char *data, int len)
>
> static int recv_msg(int fd, char *buf, int len, int *gso_size)
> {
> - char control[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(uint16_t))] = {0};
> + char control[CMSG_SPACE(sizeof(int))] = {0};
> struct msghdr msg = {0};
> struct iovec iov = {0};
> struct cmsghdr *cmsg;
> - uint16_t *gsosizeptr;
> int ret;
>
> iov.iov_base = buf;
> @@ -237,8 +236,7 @@ static int recv_msg(int fd, char *buf, int len, int *gso_size)
> cmsg = CMSG_NXTHDR(&msg, cmsg)) {
> if (cmsg->cmsg_level == SOL_UDP
> && cmsg->cmsg_type == UDP_GRO) {
> - gsosizeptr = (uint16_t *) CMSG_DATA(cmsg);
> - *gso_size = *gsosizeptr;
> + *gso_size = *(int *)CMSG_DATA(cmsg);
> break;
> }
> }
> --
> 2.39.1
>
Yes, it seems user space often do not bother verifying cmsg->cmsg_len
against CMSG_LEN(sizeof(expected type))
(such sanity tests could be added to many of our selftests)
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists