netdev - Re: [PATCH intel-net] ice: xsk: disable txq irq before flushing hw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Y+47xTC/erlyKQtB@lincoln>
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 15:20:53 +0100
From:   Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>
To:     Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
CC:     <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
        <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH intel-net] ice: xsk: disable txq irq before flushing hw

On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 01:28:39PM +0100, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> ice_qp_dis() intends to stop a given queue pair that is a target of xsk
> pool attach/detach. One of the steps is to disable interrupts on these
> queues. It currently is broken in a way that txq irq is turned off
> *after* HW flush which in turn takes no effect.
> 
> ice_qp_dis():
> -> ice_qvec_dis_irq()
> --> disable rxq irq
> --> flush hw
> -> ice_vsi_stop_tx_ring()
> -->disable txq irq
> 
> Below splat can be triggered by following steps:
> - start xdpsock WITHOUT loading xdp prog
> - run xdp_rxq_info with XDP_TX action on this interface
> - start traffic
> - terminate xdpsock
> 
> [  256.312485] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000018
> [  256.319560] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
> [  256.324775] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
> [  256.329994] PGD 0 P4D 0
> [  256.332574] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
> [  256.337006] CPU: 3 PID: 32 Comm: ksoftirqd/3 Tainted: G           OE      6.2.0-rc5+ #51
> [  256.345218] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WFT/S2600WFT, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0008.031920191559 03/19/2019
> [  256.355807] RIP: 0010:ice_clean_rx_irq_zc+0x9c/0x7d0 [ice]
> [  256.361423] Code: b7 8f 8a 00 00 00 66 39 ca 0f 84 f1 04 00 00 49 8b 47 40 4c 8b 24 d0 41 0f b7 45 04 66 25 ff 3f 66 89 04 24 0f 84 85 02 00 00 <49> 8b 44 24 18 0f b7 14 24 48 05 00 01 00 00 49 89 04 24 49 89 44
> [  256.380463] RSP: 0018:ffffc900088bfd20 EFLAGS: 00010206
> [  256.385765] RAX: 000000000000003c RBX: 0000000000000035 RCX: 000000000000067f
> [  256.393012] RDX: 0000000000000775 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff8881deb3ac80
> [  256.400256] RBP: 000000000000003c R08: ffff889847982710 R09: 0000000000010000
> [  256.407500] R10: ffffffff82c060c0 R11: 0000000000000004 R12: 0000000000000000
> [  256.414746] R13: ffff88811165eea0 R14: ffffc9000d255000 R15: ffff888119b37600
> [  256.421990] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8897e0cc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> [  256.430207] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [  256.436036] CR2: 0000000000000018 CR3: 0000000005c0a006 CR4: 00000000007706e0
> [  256.443283] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> [  256.450527] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> [  256.457770] PKRU: 55555554
> [  256.460529] Call Trace:
> [  256.463015]  <TASK>
> [  256.465157]  ? ice_xmit_zc+0x6e/0x150 [ice]
> [  256.469437]  ice_napi_poll+0x46d/0x680 [ice]
> [  256.473815]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x1b/0x40
> [  256.478863]  __napi_poll+0x29/0x160
> [  256.482409]  net_rx_action+0x136/0x260
> [  256.486222]  __do_softirq+0xe8/0x2e5
> [  256.489853]  ? smpboot_thread_fn+0x2c/0x270
> [  256.494108]  run_ksoftirqd+0x2a/0x50
> [  256.497747]  smpboot_thread_fn+0x1c1/0x270
> [  256.501907]  ? __pfx_smpboot_thread_fn+0x10/0x10
> [  256.506594]  kthread+0xea/0x120
> [  256.509785]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
> [  256.513597]  ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
> [  256.517238]  </TASK>
> 
> In fact, irqs were not disabled and napi managed to be scheduled and run
> while xsk_pool pointer was still valid, but SW ring of xdp_buff pointers
> was already freed.
> 
> To fix this, call ice_qvec_dis_irq() after ice_vsi_stop_tx_ring(). Also
> while at it, remove redundant ice_clean_rx_ring() call - this is handled
> in ice_qp_clean_rings().
> 
> Fixes: 2d4238f55697 ("ice: Add support for AF_XDP")

Reviewed-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>

> Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c
> index 917c75e530ca..6b8aeaa32d0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_xsk.c
> @@ -184,8 +184,6 @@ static int ice_qp_dis(struct ice_vsi *vsi, u16 q_idx)
>  	}
>  	netif_tx_stop_queue(netdev_get_tx_queue(vsi->netdev, q_idx));
>  
> -	ice_qvec_dis_irq(vsi, rx_ring, q_vector);
> -
>  	ice_fill_txq_meta(vsi, tx_ring, &txq_meta);
>  	err = ice_vsi_stop_tx_ring(vsi, ICE_NO_RESET, 0, tx_ring, &txq_meta);
>  	if (err)
> @@ -200,10 +198,11 @@ static int ice_qp_dis(struct ice_vsi *vsi, u16 q_idx)
>  		if (err)
>  			return err;
>  	}
> +	ice_qvec_dis_irq(vsi, rx_ring, q_vector);
> +
>  	err = ice_vsi_ctrl_one_rx_ring(vsi, false, q_idx, true);
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
> -	ice_clean_rx_ring(rx_ring);
>  
>  	ice_qvec_toggle_napi(vsi, q_vector, false);
>  	ice_qp_clean_rings(vsi, q_idx);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>