lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y+6LBeMIxXDw0JF7@imac101>
Date:   Thu, 16 Feb 2023 20:59:01 +0100
From:   Alain Volmat <avolmat@...com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>,
        Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] ARM: removal of STiH415/STiH416 remainings bits

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 10:13:20AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2023 10:12:25 +0100 Alain Volmat wrote:
> > Having seen situations like that for some other series I was guessing
> > that each maintainer would apply the relevant patches on his side.
> > Those two platforms being no more used, there is no specific patch
> > ordering to keep.
> > 
> > I've actually been wondering at the beginning how should I post those
> > patches.  If another way is preferrable I can post again differently
> > if that helps.
> 
> You'd have most luck getting the changes accepted for 6.3 if you split
> this up and resend to individual maintainers.

Alright, since those patches do not have real dependencies between each
others, I won't update this serie and send the patches separately to
their related maintainers.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ