[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y++CiWXJXi/gZfcI@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 14:35:05 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>,
Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@....com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Byungho An <bh74.an@...sung.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>,
Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@...rochip.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/18] net: phy: Add phydev->eee_active to simplify
adjust link callbacks
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 10:09:19AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 04:42:13AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > MAC drivers which support EEE need to know the results of the EEE
> > auto-neg in order to program the hardware to perform EEE or not. The
> > oddly named phy_init_eee() can be used to determine this, it returns 0
> > if EEE should be used, or a negative error code,
> > e.g. -EOPPROTONOTSUPPORT if the PHY does not support EEE or negotiate
> > resulted in it not being used.
> >
> > However, many MAC drivers get this wrong. Add phydev->eee_active which
> > indicates the result of the autoneg for EEE, including if EEE is
> > administratively disabled with ethtool. The MAC driver can then access
> > this in the same way as link speed and duplex in the adjust link
> > callback.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/phy/phy.c | 3 +++
> > include/linux/phy.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> > index b33e55a7364e..1e6df250d0d0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy.c
> > @@ -916,9 +916,12 @@ static int phy_check_link_status(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > if (phydev->link && phydev->state != PHY_RUNNING) {
> > phy_check_downshift(phydev);
> > phydev->state = PHY_RUNNING;
> > + phydev->eee_active = genphy_c45_eee_is_active(phydev,
> > + NULL, NULL, NULL);
>
> genphy_c45_eee_is_active() may return an error.
Yep. So we want eee_active false on error.
Thanks
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists