netdev - [net-next V2 9/9] net/mlx5e: RX, Remove doubtful unlikely call

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230218090513.284718-10-saeed@kernel.org>
Date:   Sat, 18 Feb 2023 01:05:13 -0800
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc:     Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
        Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>,
        Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Subject: [net-next V2 9/9] net/mlx5e: RX, Remove doubtful unlikely call

From: Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>

When building an skb in non-linear mode, it is not likely nor unlikely
that the xdp buff has fragments, it depends on the size of the packet
received.

Signed-off-by: Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
index 8e64f4b48d53..15d9932f741d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_rx.c
@@ -1718,7 +1718,7 @@ mlx5e_skb_from_cqe_nonlinear(struct mlx5e_rq *rq, struct mlx5e_wqe_frag_info *wi
 
 	page_ref_inc(head_wi->au->page);
 
-	if (unlikely(xdp_buff_has_frags(&mxbuf.xdp))) {
+	if (xdp_buff_has_frags(&mxbuf.xdp)) {
 		int i;
 
 		/* sinfo->nr_frags is reset by build_skb, calculate again. */
-- 
2.39.1