[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/OSjLGWRihONXX4@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2023 16:32:28 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 3/4] net: phy: do not force EEE support
> > > if (data->advertised)
> > > - adv[0] = data->advertised;
> > > - else
> > > - linkmode_copy(adv, phydev->supported_eee);
> > > + phydev->advertising_eee[0] = data->advertised;
> >
> > Is there a reason not to use ethtool_convert_legacy_u32_to_link_mode()?
> > I'm guessing this will be more efficient.
>
> Or at leas more readable. I'll update it.
I read that and had a similar reaction to Russell. Please do use the
helper.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists