netdev - Re: [PATCH net] sctp: add a refcnt in sctp_stream

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <744a8737ce7dc2f149c82738e4ab15233d0b35d9.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Feb 2023 08:30:54 +0100
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:     Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
        network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
        Zhengchao Shao <shaozhengchao@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: add a refcnt in sctp_stream_priorities to
 avoid a nested loop

Hello,

On Wed, 2023-02-15 at 15:04 -0500, Xin Long wrote:
> With this refcnt added in sctp_stream_priorities, we don't need to
> traverse all streams to check if the prio is used by other streams
> when freeing one stream's prio in sctp_sched_prio_free_sid(). This
> can avoid a nested loop (up to 65535 * 65535), which may cause a
> stuck as Ying reported:
> 
>     watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#23 stuck for 26s! [ksoftirqd/23:136]
>     Call Trace:
>      <TASK>
>      sctp_sched_prio_free_sid+0xab/0x100 [sctp]
>      sctp_stream_free_ext+0x64/0xa0 [sctp]
>      sctp_stream_free+0x31/0x50 [sctp]
>      sctp_association_free+0xa5/0x200 [sctp]
> 
> Note that it doesn't need to use refcount_t type for this counter,
> as its accessing is always protected under the sock lock.
> 
> Fixes: 9ed7bfc79542 ("sctp: fix memory leak in sctp_stream_outq_migrate()")
> Reported-by: Ying Xu <yinxu@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
> ---
>  include/net/sctp/structs.h   |  1 +
>  net/sctp/stream_sched_prio.c | 47 +++++++++++++-----------------------
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/sctp/structs.h b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> index afa3781e3ca2..e1f6e7fc2b11 100644
> --- a/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> +++ b/include/net/sctp/structs.h
> @@ -1412,6 +1412,7 @@ struct sctp_stream_priorities {
>  	/* The next stream in line */
>  	struct sctp_stream_out_ext *next;
>  	__u16 prio;
> +	__u16 users;

I'm sorry for the late feedback. Reading the commit message, it looks
like this counter could reach at least 64K. Is a __u16 integer wide
enough?

Thanks!

Paolo