[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230221083006.012507c3@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 08:30:06 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Patrisious Haddad <phaddad@...dia.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Zhang <markzhang@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Raed Salem <raeds@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/mlx5: Fix memory leak in IPsec RoCE
creation
On Tue, 21 Feb 2023 08:39:40 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 04:50:00PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Sun, 19 Feb 2023 14:59:57 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > > -rule_fail:
> > > +fail_rule:
> > > mlx5_destroy_flow_group(roce->g);
> > > -fail:
> > > +fail_group:
> > > mlx5_destroy_flow_table(ft);
> > > +fail_table:
> > > + kvfree(in);
> > > return err;
> >
> > If you're touching all of them please name them after what they do.
> > Much easier to review.
>
> I can change it, but all mlx* drivers and randomly chosen place in ice
> use label to show what fail and not what will be done. Such notation
> gives an ability to refactor code without changing label names if
> failed part of code is not removed.
Please refactor, and it'd be great if the convention was changed for
all new code in these drivers.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists