lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 23 Feb 2023 12:15:52 +0100
From:   Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To:     Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
Cc:     borisp@...dia.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: tls: fix possible info leak in
 tls_set_device_offload()

2023-02-23, 17:05:08 +0800, Hangyu Hua wrote:
> After tls_set_device_offload() fails, we enter tls_set_sw_offload(). But
> tls_set_sw_offload can't set cctx->iv and cctx->rec_seq to NULL if it fails
> before kmalloc cctx->iv. This may cause info leak when we call
> do_tls_getsockopt_conf().

Is there really an issue here?

If both tls_set_device_offload and tls_set_sw_offload fail,
do_tls_setsockopt_conf will clear crypto_{send,recv} from the context.
Then the TLS_CRYPTO_INFO_READY in do_tls_getsockopt_conf will fail, so
we won't try to access iv or rec_seq.

-- 
Sabrina

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ