[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230224102839.26538-1-hbh25y@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 18:28:39 +0800
From: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
To: borisp@...dia.com, john.fastabend@...il.com, kuba@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
ilyal@...lanox.com, aviadye@...lanox.com, sd@...asysnail.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] net: tls: fix possible info leak in tls_set_device_offload()
After tls_set_device_offload() fails, we enter tls_set_sw_offload(). But
tls_set_sw_offload can't set cctx->iv and cctx->rec_seq to NULL if it fails
before kmalloc cctx->iv. It is better to Set them to NULL to avoid any
potential info leak.
Fixes: e8f69799810c ("net/tls: Add generic NIC offload infrastructure")
Signed-off-by: Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
---
v2: change commit log. The original issue will be fixed in another patch.
net/tls/tls_device.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_device.c b/net/tls/tls_device.c
index 6c593788dc25..a63f6f727f58 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_device.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_device.c
@@ -1241,8 +1241,10 @@ int tls_set_device_offload(struct sock *sk, struct tls_context *ctx)
kfree(start_marker_record);
free_rec_seq:
kfree(ctx->tx.rec_seq);
+ ctx->tx.rec_seq = NULL;
free_iv:
kfree(ctx->tx.iv);
+ ctx->tx.iv = NULL;
release_netdev:
dev_put(netdev);
return rc;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists