[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <afcdeff6-e47e-6291-fa10-4919a50276c5@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2023 22:09:10 -0800
From: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>, hkallweit1@...il.com,
nic_swsd@...ltek.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com
Cc: koba.ko@...onical.com, acelan.kao@...onical.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, vidyas@...dia.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 1/5] Revert "PCI/ASPM: Unexport
pcie_aspm_support_enabled()"
On 2/24/23 7:46 PM, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> This reverts commit ba13d4575da5e656a3cbc18583e0da5c5d865417.
>
> This will be used by module once again.
Since this is a single line change, why revert it? It should be simpler
to export it in the patch that needs it right?
>
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
> ---
> v9:
> - No change.
>
> v8:
> - New patch.
>
> drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> index 4b4184563a927..692d6953f0970 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pcie/aspm.c
> @@ -1372,3 +1372,4 @@ bool pcie_aspm_support_enabled(void)
> {
> return aspm_support_enabled;
> }
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcie_aspm_support_enabled);
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists