lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 24 Feb 2023 22:16:33 -0800
From:   Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>, hkallweit1@...il.com,
        nic_swsd@...ltek.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com
Cc:     koba.ko@...onical.com, acelan.kao@...onical.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, vidyas@...dia.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 4/5] r8169: Use spinlock to guard config
 register locking



On 2/24/23 7:46 PM, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> Right now r8169 doesn't have parallel access to its config register, but
> the next patch makes the driver access config register at anytime.
> 
> So add a spinlock to protect the config register from any potential race.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
> ---
> v9:
>  - Replace mutex with spinlock so it can be used in softirq context.
> 
> v8:
>  - Swap the place when using the mutex. Protect when config register is
>    unlocked.
> 
> v7:
>  - This is a new patch.
> 
>  drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> index a857650c2e82b..fb73b5386701f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
> @@ -613,6 +613,8 @@ struct rtl8169_private {
>  		struct work_struct work;
>  	} wk;
>  
> +	spinlock_t config_lock;
> +
>  	unsigned supports_gmii:1;
>  	unsigned aspm_manageable:1;
>  	dma_addr_t counters_phys_addr;
> @@ -662,10 +664,12 @@ static inline struct device *tp_to_dev(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>  static void rtl_lock_config_regs(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>  {
>  	RTL_W8(tp, Cfg9346, Cfg9346_Lock);
> +	spin_unlock_bh(&tp->config_lock);

You mean spin_lock_bh() here right?

>  }
>  
>  static void rtl_unlock_config_regs(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>  {
> +	spin_lock_bh(&tp->config_lock);
>  	RTL_W8(tp, Cfg9346, Cfg9346_Unlock);
>  }
>  
> @@ -5217,6 +5221,8 @@ static int rtl_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>  		return rc;
>  	}
>  
> +	spin_lock_init(&tp->config_lock);
> +
>  	tp->mmio_addr = pcim_iomap_table(pdev)[region];
>  
>  	xid = (RTL_R32(tp, TxConfig) >> 20) & 0xfcf;

-- 
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ