netdev - Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: cfg80211: Use WSEC to set SAE password

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 28 Feb 2023 02:52:08 +0900
From:   Hector Martin <marcan@...can.st>
To:     Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
        Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>,
        Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
        Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Double Lo <double.lo@...ineon.com>
Cc:     Sven Peter <sven@...npeter.dev>,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@...enzweig.io>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        asahi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
        SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: cfg80211: Use WSEC to set SAE password

On 14/02/2023 19.38, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/14/2023 11:30 AM, Hector Martin wrote:
>> On 14/02/2023 19.07, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> + Double Lo
>>>
>>> On 2/14/2023 10:33 AM, Hector Martin wrote:
>>>> Using the WSEC command instead of sae_password seems to be the supported
>>>> mechanism on newer firmware, and also how the brcmdhd driver does it.
>>>
>>> The SAE code in brcmfmac was added by Cypress/Infineon. For my BCA
>>> devices that did not work, but this change should be verified on Cypress
>>> hardware.
>>
>> Do you mean the existing SAE code does not work on BCA, or this version
>> doesn't?
> 
> I meant the existing SAE code. I will give your patches a spin on the 
> devices I have.
> 
>> I assume/hope this version works for WCC in general, since that is what
>> the Apple-relevant chips are tagged as. If so it sounds like we need a
>> firmware type conditional on this, if CYW needs the existing behavior.
> 
> Right. Let's hope we get some feedback from them.

Any news on this? Nothing from the Cypress guys (nor to any of my
previous emails about other stuff, for that matter), so if you can
confirm this works on your chips I'd rather just blindly add the CYW/not
firmware variant check and call it a day.

We can't wait forever for them to show up. If they expect their chips to
continue work with mainline they need to actually interact on the MLs,
otherwise they should expect us to possibly accidentally break things
even if we try not to. As far as I can tell they seem completely
disinterested in talking about anything, and we can't let that block
progress for everyone else.

- Hector