netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: tls: fix possible race condition between do_tls_getsockopt_conf() and do_tls_setsockopt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230227110750.6988fca5@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2023 11:07:50 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Hangyu Hua <hbh25y@...il.com>
Cc:     Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, borisp@...dia.com,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com, davejwatson@...com, aviadye@...lanox.com,
        ilyal@...lanox.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: tls: fix possible race condition between
 do_tls_getsockopt_conf() and do_tls_setsockopt_conf()

On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 11:26:18 +0800 Hangyu Hua wrote:
> In order to reduce ambiguity, I think it may be a good idea only to
> lock do_tls_getsockopt_conf() like we did in do_tls_setsockopt()
> 
> It will look like:
> 
> static int do_tls_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int optname,
> 			     char __user *optval, int __user *optlen)
> {
> 	int rc = 0;
> 
> 	switch (optname) {
> 	case TLS_TX:
> 	case TLS_RX:
> +		lock_sock(sk);
> 		rc = do_tls_getsockopt_conf(sk, optval, optlen,
> 					    optname == TLS_TX);
> +		release_sock(sk);
> 		break;
> 	case TLS_TX_ZEROCOPY_RO:
> 		rc = do_tls_getsockopt_tx_zc(sk, optval, optlen);
> 		break;
> 	case TLS_RX_EXPECT_NO_PAD:
> 		rc = do_tls_getsockopt_no_pad(sk, optval, optlen);
> 		break;
> 	default:
> 		rc = -ENOPROTOOPT;
> 		break;
> 	}
> 	return rc;
> }
> 
> Of cause, I will clean the lock in do_tls_getsockopt_conf(). What do you
> guys think?

I'd suggest to take the lock around the entire switch statement.