netdev - Re: [RFC 0/6] pcmcia: separate 16-bit support from cardbus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 Feb 2023 21:54:46 +0100
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
        Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>,
        Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
        Manuel Lauss <manuel.lauss@...il.com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        YOKOTA Hiroshi <yokota@...lab.is.tsukuba.ac.jp>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] pcmcia: separate 16-bit support from cardbus

On 27.02.2023 21:32:40, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> On 27.02.23 20:53, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023, at 20:07, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> 
> > > I assume these CAN bus PCMCIA interfaces won't work after your patch
> > > set, right?
> > 
> > Correct, the patch series in its current form breaks this since
> > your laptop is cardbus compatible. The options I can see are:
> > 
> > - abandon my series and keep everything unchanged, possibly removing
> >    some of the pcmcia drivers that Dominik identified as candidates
> > 
> > - decide on a future timeline for when you are comfortable with
> >    discontinuing this setup and require any CAN users with cardbus
> >    laptops to move to USB or cardbus CAN adapters, apply the series
> >    then
> > 
> > - duplicate the yenta_socket driver to have two variants of that,
> >    require the user to choose between the cardbus and the pcmcia
> >    variant depending on what card is going to be used.
> > 
> > Can you give more background on who is using the EMS PCMCIA card?
> > I.e. are there reasons to use this device on modern kernels with
> > machines that could also support the USB, expresscard or cardbus
> > variants, or are you likely the only one doing this for the
> > purpose of maintaining the driver?
> 
> Haha, good point.
> 
> In fact the EMS PCMCIA, the PEAK PCMCIA (PCAN PC Card) and the supported
> Softing PCMCIA cards are nearly 20 year old designs and they are all
> discontinued for some time now. Today you can easily get a high performance
> Classical CAN USB adapter with an excellent OSS firmware for ~13 EUR.
> 
> The only other laptop CAN "Cards" I'm aware of are PCIe "ExpressCard" 34/54
> from PEAK System which use the PCI subsystem.
> 
> Maybe you are right and we should simply drop the support for those old
> PCMCIA drivers which will still be supported for the LTS 6.1 lifetime then.
> 
> @Marc Kleine-Budde: What do you think about removing these three drivers?

I don't have any of these cards, nor any $CUSTOMER who's using it.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de  |
Vertretung West/Dortmund         | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)