netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/4] net/smc: add BPF injection on smc negotiation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1677602291-1666-4-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Wed,  1 Mar 2023 00:38:10 +0800
From:   "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, wenjia@...ux.ibm.com, jaka@...ux.ibm.com,
        ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org
Cc:     kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/4] net/smc: add BPF injection on smc negotiation

From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>

This patch try add BPF injection on smc negotiation, so that
the application can decided whether to use smc or not through
eBPF progs.

In particular, some applications may need global dynamic information
to make decision. Therefore, we also inject a information collect
point into smc_release.

Note that, in order to make negotiation can be decided by application,
sockets must have SMC_LIMIT_HS set.

Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
 net/smc/af_smc.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index a4cccdf..7ebe5e8 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -166,6 +166,9 @@ static bool smc_hs_congested(const struct sock *sk)
 	if (workqueue_congested(WORK_CPU_UNBOUND, smc_hs_wq))
 		return true;
 
+	if (!smc_sock_should_select_smc(smc))
+		return true;
+
 	return false;
 }
 
@@ -320,6 +323,9 @@ static int smc_release(struct socket *sock)
 	sock_hold(sk); /* sock_put below */
 	smc = smc_sk(sk);
 
+	/* trigger info gathering if needed.*/
+	smc_sock_perform_collecting_info(sk, SMC_SOCK_CLOSED_TIMING);
+
 	old_state = sk->sk_state;
 
 	/* cleanup for a dangling non-blocking connect */
@@ -1627,7 +1633,14 @@ static int smc_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr,
 	}
 
 	smc_copy_sock_settings_to_clc(smc);
-	tcp_sk(smc->clcsock->sk)->syn_smc = 1;
+	/* accept out connection as SMC connection */
+	if (smc_sock_should_select_smc(smc) == SK_PASS) {
+		tcp_sk(smc->clcsock->sk)->syn_smc = 1;
+	} else {
+		tcp_sk(smc->clcsock->sk)->syn_smc = 0;
+		smc_switch_to_fallback(smc, /* just a chooice */ 0);
+	}
+
 	if (smc->connect_nonblock) {
 		rc = -EALREADY;
 		goto out;
-- 
1.8.3.1