netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: lan966x: Fix port police support using tc-matchall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <167769181807.25108.2018314094074685958.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 01 Mar 2023 17:30:18 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: lan966x: Fix port police support using tc-matchall

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:

On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 21:47:42 +0100 you wrote:
> When the police was removed from the port, then it was trying to
> remove the police from the police id and not from the actual
> police index.
> The police id represents the id of the police and police index
> represents the position in HW where the police is situated.
> The port police id can be any number while the port police index
> is a number based on the port chip port.
> Fix this by deleting the police from HW that is situated at the
> police index and not police id.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net] net: lan966x: Fix port police support using tc-matchall
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/81563d8548b0

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html