[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y/8uWeQNxteyH+gT@corigine.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2023 11:52:09 +0100
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] r8169: disable ASPM during NAPI poll
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 02:50:43PM +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2023 at 5:43 AM Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > This is a rework of ideas from Kai-Heng on how to avoid the known
> > ASPM issues whilst still allowing for a maximum of ASPM-related power
> > savings. As a prerequisite some locking is added first.
> >
> > This change affects a bigger number of supported chip versions,
> > therefore this series comes as RFC first for further testing.
>
> Thanks for the series.
>
> Tested-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
FWIIW, I also looked over this series and it looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists