netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] virtio-net: Fix probe of virtio-net on kvmtool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Mar 2023 16:46:03 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, rbradford@...osinc.com,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] virtio-net: Fix probe of virtio-net on kvmtool

On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 04:48:38 -0500 Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Looks not the core can try to enable and disable features according to
> > the diff between features and hw_features
> > 
> > static inline netdev_features_t netdev_get_wanted_features(
> >         struct net_device *dev)
> > {
> >         return (dev->features & ~dev->hw_features) | dev->wanted_features;
> > }
> 
> yes what we do work according to code.  So the documentation is wrong then?

It's definitely incomplete but which part are you saying is wrong?