[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <94544cd0-18da-40d1-8691-66e50d42bfb4@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2023 20:46:05 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Jie Wang <wangjie125@...wei.com>,
Guangbin Huang <huangguangbin2@...wei.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>,
Alexandru Tachici <alexandru.tachici@...log.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <linux@...pel-privat.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] net: Let the active time stamping layer be
selectable.
> The timestamping part is via the netdev, which is a separate entity,
> and its that entity which is responsible for identifying which PHC it
> is connected to (normally by filling in the phc_index field of
> ethtool_ts_info.)
>
> Think of is as:
>
> netdev ---- timestamping ---- PHC
>
> since we can have:
>
> netdev1 ---- timestamping \
> netdev2 ---- timestamping -*--- PHC
> netdev3 ---- timestamping /
>
> Since the ioctl is to do with requesting what we want the timestamping
> layer to be doing with packets, putting it in ptp_clock_info makes
> very little sense.
So there does not appear to be an object to represent a time stamper?
Should one be added? It looks like it needs two ops hwtstamp_set() and
hwtstamp_get(). It would then be registered with the ptp core. And
then the rest of what i said would apply...
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists