netdev - [PATCH 2/5] wireguard: fix wg_cpumask_choose

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230306160651.2016767-3-vernon2gm@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue,  7 Mar 2023 00:06:48 +0800
From:   Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@...il.com>
To:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tytso@....edu, Jason@...c4.com,
        davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
        pabeni@...hat.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        yury.norov@...il.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        linux@...musvillemoes.dk, james.smart@...adcom.com,
        dick.kennedy@...adcom.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] wireguard: fix wg_cpumask_choose_online() if no further cpus set

After commit 596ff4a09b89 ("cpumask: re-introduce constant-sized cpumask
optimizations"), when NR_CPUS <= BITS_PER_LONG, small_cpumask_bits used
a macro instead of variable-sized for efficient.

If no further cpus set, the cpumask_next() returns small_cpumask_bits,
it must greater than or equal to nr_cpumask_bits, so fix it to correctly.

Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@...il.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireguard/queueing.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/queueing.h b/drivers/net/wireguard/queueing.h
index 583adb37ee1e..41adeac3ee0b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireguard/queueing.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/queueing.h
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static inline int wg_cpumask_choose_online(int *stored_cpu, unsigned int id)
 {
 	unsigned int cpu = *stored_cpu, cpu_index, i;
 
-	if (unlikely(cpu == nr_cpumask_bits ||
+	if (unlikely(cpu >= nr_cpumask_bits ||
 		     !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask))) {
 		cpu_index = id % cpumask_weight(cpu_online_mask);
 		cpu = cpumask_first(cpu_online_mask);
-- 
2.34.1