[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <addaa95e4c2e840ac041efcedc99a235af90c6c1.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2023 17:58:37 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
Jaewan Kim <jaewan@...gle.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com, adelva@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/5] mac80211_hwsim: add PMSR capability support
>
> > @@ -3186,6 +3218,7 @@ struct hwsim_new_radio_params {
> > u32 *ciphers;
> > u8 n_ciphers;
> > bool mlo;
> > + const struct cfg80211_pmsr_capabilities *pmsr_capa;
>
> nit: not related to this patch,
> but there are lots of holes in hwsim_new_radio_params.
> And, I think that all fields, other than the new pmsr_capa field,
> could fit into one cacheline on x86_64.
>
> I'm unsure if it is worth cleaning up or not.
>
Probably not. It's just a temporary thing there, I don't think we even
have it for longer than temporarily on the stack.
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists