[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZAYk/1g3Hz/UX7Ir@corigine.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 18:38:07 +0100
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Jaewan Kim <jaewan@...gle.com>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, adelva@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/5] mac80211_hwsim: add PMSR capability support
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 05:58:37PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >
> > > @@ -3186,6 +3218,7 @@ struct hwsim_new_radio_params {
> > > u32 *ciphers;
> > > u8 n_ciphers;
> > > bool mlo;
> > > + const struct cfg80211_pmsr_capabilities *pmsr_capa;
> >
> > nit: not related to this patch,
> > but there are lots of holes in hwsim_new_radio_params.
> > And, I think that all fields, other than the new pmsr_capa field,
> > could fit into one cacheline on x86_64.
> >
> > I'm unsure if it is worth cleaning up or not.
> >
>
> Probably not. It's just a temporary thing there, I don't think we even
> have it for longer than temporarily on the stack.
Thanks, got it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists