netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/5] scsi: lpfc: fix lpfc_cpu_affinity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZAZIgcpEBE7HXBuy@vernon-pc>
Date:   Tue, 7 Mar 2023 04:09:37 +0800
From:   Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@...il.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     tytso@....edu, Jason@...c4.com, davem@...emloft.net,
        edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
        jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        yury.norov@...il.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        linux@...musvillemoes.dk, james.smart@...adcom.com,
        dick.kennedy@...adcom.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        wireguard@...ts.zx2c4.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] scsi: lpfc: fix lpfc_cpu_affinity_check() if no
 further cpus set

On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 10:48:04AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 8:07 AM Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > -                               if (new_cpu == nr_cpumask_bits)
> > +                               if (new_cpu >= nr_cpumask_bits)
>
> This all should use "nr_cpu_ids", not "nr_cpumask_bits".
>
> But I really suspect that it should all be rewritten to not do that
> thing over and over, but just use a helper function for it.
>
>   int lpfc_next_present_cpu(int n, int alternate)
>   {
>         n = cpumask_next(n, cpu_present_mask);
>         if (n >= nr_cpu_ids)
>                 n = alternate;
>         return n;
>   }
>
> and then you could just use
>
>         start_cpu = lpfc_next_present_cpu(new_cpu, first_cpu);

OK, thanks you very much.

I'll send a second version shortly

>
> or similar.
>
>               Linus
>
> PS. We "kind of" already have a helper function for this:
> cpumask_next_wrap(). But it's really meant for a different pattern
> entirely, so let's not confuse things.