netdev - Re: [net-next] ptp_ocp: add force_irq to xilinx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 6 Mar 2023 13:22:00 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
        Vadim Fedorenko <vadfed@...a.com>,
        Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next] ptp_ocp: add force_irq to xilinx_spi configuration

On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 13:20:13 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Mar 2023 21:10:40 +0000 Vadim Fedorenko wrote:
> > On 06.03.2023 20:49, Jakub Kicinski wrote:  
> > > Give it until Friday, the patch needs to be in the networking trees
> > > (our PR cadence during the merge window is less regular than outside
> > > it).    
> > 
> > Looks like "1dd46599f83a spi: xilinx: add force_irq for QSPI mode" is in net and 
> > net-next trees already? Or which patch are you talking about?  
> 
> Hm, you're right. Any idea why both kbuild bot and our own CI think
> this doesn't build, then?

Probably because they both use master :S

kernel test robot folks, could you please switch from master to main
as the base for networking patches?