[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d8274ac-4344-23b4-d9a3-cad4c39517d4@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 22:51:35 +0100
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: improve phy_read_poll_timeout
cond sometimes is (val & MASK) what may result in a false positive
if val is a negative errno. We shouldn't evaluate cond if val < 0.
This has no functional impact here, but it's not nice.
Therefore switch order of the checks.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
---
include/linux/phy.h | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/phy.h b/include/linux/phy.h
index 36bf0bbc8..fefd5091b 100644
--- a/include/linux/phy.h
+++ b/include/linux/phy.h
@@ -1130,16 +1130,15 @@ static inline int phy_read(struct phy_device *phydev, u32 regnum)
#define phy_read_poll_timeout(phydev, regnum, val, cond, sleep_us, \
timeout_us, sleep_before_read) \
({ \
- int __ret = read_poll_timeout(phy_read, val, (cond) || val < 0, \
+ int __ret = read_poll_timeout(phy_read, val, val < 0 || (cond), \
sleep_us, timeout_us, sleep_before_read, phydev, regnum); \
- if (val < 0) \
+ if (val < 0) \
__ret = val; \
if (__ret) \
phydev_err(phydev, "%s failed: %d\n", __func__, __ret); \
__ret; \
})
-
/**
* __phy_read - convenience function for reading a given PHY register
* @phydev: the phy_device struct
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists