netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] qede: remove linux/version.h and linux/compiler.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <df8a446a-e8a9-3b3d-fd0f-791f0d01a0c9@collabora.com>
Date:   Tue, 7 Mar 2023 18:39:20 +0500
From:   Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>,
        Ariel Elior <aelior@...vell.com>,
        Manish Chopra <manishc@...vell.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] qede: remove linux/version.h and linux/compiler.h

On 3/4/23 4:54 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri,  3 Mar 2023 23:53:50 +0500 Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>> make versioncheck reports the following:
>> ./drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede.h: 10 linux/version.h not needed.
>> ./drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qede/qede_ethtool.c: 7 linux/version.h not needed.
>>
>> So remove linux/version.h from both of these files. Also remove
>> linux/compiler.h while at it as it is also not being used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
> 
> # Form letter - net-next is closed
> 
> The merge window for v6.3 has begun and therefore net-next is closed
> for new drivers, features, code refactoring and optimizations.
> We are currently accepting bug fixes only.
> 
> Please repost when net-next reopens after Mar 6th.
It is Mar 7th. Please review.

> 
> RFC patches sent for review only are obviously welcome at any time.

-- 
BR,
Muhammad Usama Anjum