[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230308071921-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 07:21:07 -0500
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
Cc: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Yichun Zhang <yichun@...nresty.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net, stable v1 3/3] virtio_net: add checking sq is full
inside xdp xmit
On Wed, Mar 08, 2023 at 04:13:12PM +0800, Yunsheng Lin wrote:
> On 2023/3/8 15:14, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 14:59:36 +0800, Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com> wrote:
> >> On 2023/3/8 10:49, Xuan Zhuo wrote:
> >>> If the queue of xdp xmit is not an independent queue, then when the xdp
> >>> xmit used all the desc, the xmit from the __dev_queue_xmit() may encounter
> >>> the following error.
> >>>
> >>> net ens4: Unexpected TXQ (0) queue failure: -28
> >>>
> >>> This patch adds a check whether sq is full in xdp xmit.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 56434a01b12e ("virtio_net: add XDP_TX support")
> >>> Reported-by: Yichun Zhang <yichun@...nresty.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>
> >>> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 3 +++
> >>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >>> index 46bbddaadb0d..1a309cfb4976 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> >>> @@ -767,6 +767,9 @@ static int virtnet_xdp_xmit(struct net_device *dev,
> >>> }
> >>> ret = nxmit;
> >>>
> >>> + if (!is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(vi, sq - vi->sq))
> >>> + check_sq_full_and_disable(vi, dev, sq);
> >>> +
> >>
> >> Sorry if I missed something obvious here.
> >>
> >> As the comment in start_xmit(), the current skb is added to the sq->vq, so
> >> NETDEV_TX_BUSY can not be returned.
> >>
> >> /* If running out of space, stop queue to avoid getting packets that we
> >> * are then unable to transmit.
> >> * An alternative would be to force queuing layer to requeue the skb by
> >> * returning NETDEV_TX_BUSY. However, NETDEV_TX_BUSY should not be
> >> * returned in a normal path of operation: it means that driver is not
> >> * maintaining the TX queue stop/start state properly, and causes
> >> * the stack to do a non-trivial amount of useless work.
> >> * Since most packets only take 1 or 2 ring slots, stopping the queue
> >> * early means 16 slots are typically wasted.
> >> */
> >>
> >> It there any reason not to check the sq->vq->num_free at the begin of start_xmit(),
> >> if the space is not enough for the current skb, TX queue is stopped and NETDEV_TX_BUSY
> >> is return to the stack to requeue the current skb.
> >>
> >> It seems it is the pattern that most network driver follow, and it seems we can avoid
> >> calling check_sq_full_and_disable() in this patch and not wasting 16 slots as mentioned
> >> in the comment above.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > * netdev_tx_t (*ndo_start_xmit)(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > * struct net_device *dev);
> > * Called when a packet needs to be transmitted.
> > * Returns NETDEV_TX_OK. Can return NETDEV_TX_BUSY, but you should stop
> > * the queue before that can happen; it's for obsolete devices and weird
> > * corner cases, but the stack really does a non-trivial amount
> > * of useless work if you return NETDEV_TX_BUSY.
> > * Required; cannot be NULL.
>
> Thanks for the pointer. It is intersting, it seems most driver is not flollowing
> the suggestion.
Yes - I don't know why.
> I found out why the above comment was added, but I am not sure I understand
> what does "non-trivial amount of useless work" means yet.
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/2015-April/029718.html
dev_requeue_skb
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists