[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f51dc491-d151-6e8e-1ed7-70ecf0a8b2aa@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 19:56:08 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 10/11] dt-bindings: net: phy: Document support
for LEDs node
On 08/03/2023 12:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/03/2023 18:00, Christian Marangi wrote:
>> Document support for LEDs node in phy and add an example for it.
>> PHY LED will have to match led pattern and should be treated as a
>> generic led.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
>> ---
>
> Also missing changelog, history, tags, anything. This was already v8.
>
> Also, I have doubts that your patchset is fully bisectable. Are you sure
> of this?
OK, so the leds in previous patch are not for phy but for port, so it is
properly bisectable.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists