netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND] epoll: use refcount to reduce ep

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f0c49fb4b682b81d64184d1181bc960728907474.camel@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 08 Mar 2023 21:34:43 +0100
From:   Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@...hat.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND] epoll: use refcount to reduce ep_mutex
 contention

On Wed, 2023-03-08 at 10:40 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Mar 2023 09:55:31 +0100 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> > I have a process question: I understand this is queued for the mm-
> > nonmm-unstable branch. Should I send a v5 with the above comments
> > changes or an incremental patch or something completely different?
> 
> Either is OK.  If it's a v5 I'll usually queue a delta so people who
> have a;ready reviewed can see what changed.  That delta is later
> squashed and I'll use v5's changelog for the whole.

Since even the changelog needs some fixup, I'll send a v5.

Thanks,

Paolo