netdev - Re: [PATCH net, stable v1 1/3] virtio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEsp+2GhUO9cXHuet4AAhV-CdDrScUJdvbEcAoxacdBLzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 8 Mar 2023 13:20:15 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Yichun Zhang <yichun@...nresty.com>,
        Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net, stable v1 1/3] virtio_net: reorder some funcs

On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 10:49 AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> The purpose of this is to facilitate the subsequent addition of new
> functions without introducing a separate declaration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>

Not sure such reordering is suitable for -stable.

Thanks

> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index fb5e68ed3ec2..8b31a04052f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -545,6 +545,52 @@ static struct sk_buff *page_to_skb(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>         return skb;
>  }
>
> +static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct send_queue *sq, bool in_napi)
> +{
> +       unsigned int len;
> +       unsigned int packets = 0;
> +       unsigned int bytes = 0;
> +       void *ptr;
> +
> +       while ((ptr = virtqueue_get_buf(sq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> +               if (likely(!is_xdp_frame(ptr))) {
> +                       struct sk_buff *skb = ptr;
> +
> +                       pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
> +
> +                       bytes += skb->len;
> +                       napi_consume_skb(skb, in_napi);
> +               } else {
> +                       struct xdp_frame *frame = ptr_to_xdp(ptr);
> +
> +                       bytes += xdp_get_frame_len(frame);
> +                       xdp_return_frame(frame);
> +               }
> +               packets++;
> +       }
> +
> +       /* Avoid overhead when no packets have been processed
> +        * happens when called speculatively from start_xmit.
> +        */
> +       if (!packets)
> +               return;
> +
> +       u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
> +       sq->stats.bytes += bytes;
> +       sq->stats.packets += packets;
> +       u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
> +}
> +
> +static bool is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(struct virtnet_info *vi, int q)
> +{
> +       if (q < (vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs))
> +               return false;
> +       else if (q < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
> +               return true;
> +       else
> +               return false;
> +}
> +
>  static int __virtnet_xdp_xmit_one(struct virtnet_info *vi,
>                                    struct send_queue *sq,
>                                    struct xdp_frame *xdpf)
> @@ -1714,52 +1760,6 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget,
>         return stats.packets;
>  }
>
> -static void free_old_xmit_skbs(struct send_queue *sq, bool in_napi)
> -{
> -       unsigned int len;
> -       unsigned int packets = 0;
> -       unsigned int bytes = 0;
> -       void *ptr;
> -
> -       while ((ptr = virtqueue_get_buf(sq->vq, &len)) != NULL) {
> -               if (likely(!is_xdp_frame(ptr))) {
> -                       struct sk_buff *skb = ptr;
> -
> -                       pr_debug("Sent skb %p\n", skb);
> -
> -                       bytes += skb->len;
> -                       napi_consume_skb(skb, in_napi);
> -               } else {
> -                       struct xdp_frame *frame = ptr_to_xdp(ptr);
> -
> -                       bytes += xdp_get_frame_len(frame);
> -                       xdp_return_frame(frame);
> -               }
> -               packets++;
> -       }
> -
> -       /* Avoid overhead when no packets have been processed
> -        * happens when called speculatively from start_xmit.
> -        */
> -       if (!packets)
> -               return;
> -
> -       u64_stats_update_begin(&sq->stats.syncp);
> -       sq->stats.bytes += bytes;
> -       sq->stats.packets += packets;
> -       u64_stats_update_end(&sq->stats.syncp);
> -}
> -
> -static bool is_xdp_raw_buffer_queue(struct virtnet_info *vi, int q)
> -{
> -       if (q < (vi->curr_queue_pairs - vi->xdp_queue_pairs))
> -               return false;
> -       else if (q < vi->curr_queue_pairs)
> -               return true;
> -       else
> -               return false;
> -}
> -
>  static void virtnet_poll_cleantx(struct receive_queue *rq)
>  {
>         struct virtnet_info *vi = rq->vq->vdev->priv;
> --
> 2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f
>