lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230308183443.5284c51b@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 8 Mar 2023 18:34:43 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Shay Agroskin <shayagr@...zon.com>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Woodhouse, David" <dwmw@...zon.com>,
        "Machulsky, Zorik" <zorik@...zon.com>,
        "Matushevsky, Alexander" <matua@...zon.com>,
        Saeed Bshara <saeedb@...zon.com>,
        "Wilson, Matt" <msw@...zon.com>,
        "Liguori, Anthony" <aliguori@...zon.com>,
        "Bshara, Nafea" <nafea@...zon.com>,
        "Belgazal, Netanel" <netanel@...zon.com>,
        "Saidi, Ali" <alisaidi@...zon.com>,
        "Herrenschmidt, Benjamin" <benh@...zon.com>,
        "Kiyanovski, Arthur" <akiyano@...zon.com>,
        "Dagan, Noam" <ndagan@...zon.com>,
        "Arinzon, David" <darinzon@...zon.com>,
        "Itzko, Shahar" <itzko@...zon.com>,
        "Abboud, Osama" <osamaabb@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 net-next 0/5] Add tx push buf len param to
 ethtool

On Tue, 7 Mar 2023 12:24:53 +0200 Shay Agroskin wrote:
> Changed since v2:
> - Added a check that the driver advertises support for TX push buffer
>   instead of defaulting the response to 0.
> - Moved cosmetic changes to their own commits
> - Removed usage of gotos which goes against Linux coding style
> - Make ENA driver reject an attempt to configure TX push buffer when
>   it's not supported (no LLQ is used)

LGTM!

Feel free to add my:

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>

On patch one, because checkpatch will complain otherwise.

And repost as non-RFC.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ