[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZAtnqlHZ02EJn5xt@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 18:24:05 +0100
From: Michal Kubiak <michal.kubiak@...el.com>
To: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...nic.de>
CC: <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, <patryk.piotrowski@...el.com>,
<slawomirx.laba@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] iavf: fix hang on reboot with ice
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 01:26:53PM +0100, Stefan Assmann wrote:
> When a system with E810 with existing VFs gets rebooted the following
> hang may be observed.
>
> Pid 1 is hung in iavf_remove(), part of a network driver:
> PID: 1 TASK: ffff965400e5a340 CPU: 24 COMMAND: "systemd-shutdow"
> #0 [ffffaad04005fa50] __schedule at ffffffff8b3239cb
> #1 [ffffaad04005fae8] schedule at ffffffff8b323e2d
> #2 [ffffaad04005fb00] schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock at ffffffff8b32cebc
> #3 [ffffaad04005fb80] usleep_range_state at ffffffff8b32c930
> #4 [ffffaad04005fbb0] iavf_remove at ffffffffc12b9b4c [iavf]
> #5 [ffffaad04005fbf0] pci_device_remove at ffffffff8add7513
> #6 [ffffaad04005fc10] device_release_driver_internal at ffffffff8af08baa
> #7 [ffffaad04005fc40] pci_stop_bus_device at ffffffff8adcc5fc
> #8 [ffffaad04005fc60] pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device at ffffffff8adcc81e
> #9 [ffffaad04005fc70] pci_iov_remove_virtfn at ffffffff8adf9429
> #10 [ffffaad04005fca8] sriov_disable at ffffffff8adf98e4
> #11 [ffffaad04005fcc8] ice_free_vfs at ffffffffc04bb2c8 [ice]
> #12 [ffffaad04005fd10] ice_remove at ffffffffc04778fe [ice]
> #13 [ffffaad04005fd38] ice_shutdown at ffffffffc0477946 [ice]
> #14 [ffffaad04005fd50] pci_device_shutdown at ffffffff8add58f1
> #15 [ffffaad04005fd70] device_shutdown at ffffffff8af05386
> #16 [ffffaad04005fd98] kernel_restart at ffffffff8a92a870
> #17 [ffffaad04005fda8] __do_sys_reboot at ffffffff8a92abd6
> #18 [ffffaad04005fee0] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8b317159
> #19 [ffffaad04005ff08] __context_tracking_enter at ffffffff8b31b6fc
> #20 [ffffaad04005ff18] syscall_exit_to_user_mode at ffffffff8b31b50d
> #21 [ffffaad04005ff28] do_syscall_64 at ffffffff8b317169
> #22 [ffffaad04005ff50] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe at ffffffff8b40009b
> RIP: 00007f1baa5c13d7 RSP: 00007fffbcc55a98 RFLAGS: 00000202
> RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 00007f1baa5c13d7
> RDX: 0000000001234567 RSI: 0000000028121969 RDI: 00000000fee1dead
> RBP: 00007fffbcc55ca0 R8: 0000000000000000 R9: 00007fffbcc54e90
> R10: 00007fffbcc55050 R11: 0000000000000202 R12: 0000000000000005
> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00007fffbcc55af0 R15: 0000000000000000
> ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a9 CS: 0033 SS: 002b
>
> During reboot all drivers PM shutdown callbacks are invoked.
> In iavf_shutdown() the adapter state is changed to __IAVF_REMOVE.
> In ice_shutdown() the call chain above is executed, which at some point
> calls iavf_remove(). However iavf_remove() expects the VF to be in one
> of the states __IAVF_RUNNING, __IAVF_DOWN or __IAVF_INIT_FAILED. If
> that's not the case it sleeps forever.
> So if iavf_shutdown() gets invoked before ice_shutdown() the system will
> hang indefinitely because the adapter is already in state __IAVF_REMOVE.
>
> Fix this by adding __IAVF_REMOVE to the list of allowed states in
> iavf_remove().
>
> Fixes: 974578017fc1 ("iavf: Add waiting so the port is initialized in remove")
> Reported-by: Marius Cornea <mcornea@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...nic.de>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
> index 3273aeb8fa67..83ef3a343ef0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c
> @@ -5062,7 +5062,8 @@ static void iavf_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> mutex_lock(&adapter->crit_lock);
> if (adapter->state == __IAVF_RUNNING ||
> adapter->state == __IAVF_DOWN ||
> - adapter->state == __IAVF_INIT_FAILED) {
> + adapter->state == __IAVF_INIT_FAILED ||
> + adapter->state == __IAVF_REMOVE) {
> mutex_unlock(&adapter->crit_lock);
> break;
> }
Adding the __IAVF_REMOVE state to the loop break condition seems OK to
me.
I would only consider adding a timeout to this loop to prevent endless hangs
for other potential corner cases.
Thanks,
Michal
> --
> 2.39.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists