[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2d9fa4bf-dc59-26a3-10f7-69455e2fcf5e@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 21:10:15 +0100
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
CC: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@...hat.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/3] xdp: recycle Page Pool backed skbs built
from XDP frames
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 10:33:39 -0800
> FYI
>
> test_xdp_do_redirect:FAIL:pkt_count_zero unexpected pkt_count_zero:
> actual 9936 != expected 2
>
> see CI results.
> It's a submitter job to monitor test results.
Yeah I saw it. Just for some reason I thought it's some CI problems,
like "what could possibly go wrong?" :clownface: Sorry >_<
The test assumes that only dropped pages get recycled, while this series
actually implements recycling for redirected ones as well. I'll dig into
this and adjust it on Monday. The code itself is fine :D
Thanks,
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists