[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c46ccdd8-df5b-f149-b165-beb2ce9ef046@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 22:41:44 +0100
From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Realtek linux nic maintainers <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 6/6] r8169: remove ASPM restrictions now that ASPM is
disabled during NAPI poll
On 10.03.2023 22:19, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2023 at 10:47:32PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>> Now that ASPM is disabled during NAPI poll, we can remove all ASPM
>> restrictions. This allows for higher power savings if the network
>> isn't fully loaded.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c | 27 +----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>> index 2897b9bf2..6563e4c6a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169_main.c
>> @@ -620,7 +620,6 @@ struct rtl8169_private {
>> int cfg9346_usage_count;
>>
>> unsigned supports_gmii:1;
>> - unsigned aspm_manageable:1;
>> dma_addr_t counters_phys_addr;
>> struct rtl8169_counters *counters;
>> struct rtl8169_tc_offsets tc_offset;
>> @@ -2744,8 +2743,7 @@ static void rtl_hw_aspm_clkreq_enable(struct rtl8169_private *tp, bool enable)
>> if (tp->mac_version < RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_32)
>> return;
>>
>> - /* Don't enable ASPM in the chip if OS can't control ASPM */
>> - if (enable && tp->aspm_manageable) {
>> + if (enable) {
>> rtl_mod_config5(tp, 0, ASPM_en);
>> rtl_mod_config2(tp, 0, ClkReqEn);
>>
>> @@ -5221,16 +5219,6 @@ static void rtl_init_mac_address(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>> rtl_rar_set(tp, mac_addr);
>> }
>>
>> -/* register is set if system vendor successfully tested ASPM 1.2 */
>> -static bool rtl_aspm_is_safe(struct rtl8169_private *tp)
>> -{
>> - if (tp->mac_version >= RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_61 &&
>> - r8168_mac_ocp_read(tp, 0xc0b2) & 0xf)
>> - return true;
>> -
>> - return false;
>> -}
>> -
>> static int rtl_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>> {
>> struct rtl8169_private *tp;
>> @@ -5302,19 +5290,6 @@ static int rtl_init_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
>>
>> tp->mac_version = chipset;
>>
>> - /* Disable ASPM L1 as that cause random device stop working
>> - * problems as well as full system hangs for some PCIe devices users.
>> - * Chips from RTL8168h partially have issues with L1.2, but seem
>> - * to work fine with L1 and L1.1.
>> - */
>> - if (rtl_aspm_is_safe(tp))
>> - rc = 0;
>> - else if (tp->mac_version >= RTL_GIGA_MAC_VER_46)
>> - rc = pci_disable_link_state(pdev, PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1_2);
>> - else
>> - rc = pci_disable_link_state(pdev, PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1);
>> - tp->aspm_manageable = !rc;
>
> This is beautiful. But since this series still enables/disables ASPM
> using the chip-specific knobs, I have to ask whether this is all safe
> with respect to simultaneous arbitrary ASPM enable/disable via the
> sysfs knobs. For example, it should be safe to run these loops
> indefinitely while the NIC is operating and doing NAPI polls:
>
Good question, but: Realtek doesn't provide any chip data sheets,
therefore I can't say what the chip-specific knobs actually do.
> DEV=/sys/bus/pci/devices/...
> while /bin/true; do
> echo 1 > $DEV/link/l1_2_aspm
> echo 0 > $DEV/link/l1_2_aspm
> done
> while /bin/true; do
> echo 1 > $DEV/link/l1_1_aspm
> echo 0 > $DEV/link/l1_1_aspm
> done
> while /bin/true; do
> echo 1 > $DEV/link/l1_aspm
> echo 0 > $DEV/link/l1_aspm
> done
>
> Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists