netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: re-order functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 11 Mar 2023 15:53:50 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Klaus Kudielka <klaus.kudielka@...il.com>
Cc:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: re-order functions

On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 10:41:40AM +0100, Klaus Kudielka wrote:
> Move mv88e6xxx_setup() below mv88e6xxx_mdios_register(), so that we are
> able to call the latter one from here. Do the same thing for the
> inverse functions.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Klaus Kudielka <klaus.kudielka@...il.com>

Hi Klaus

If this your first patchset for netdev? There are a few process issues
you missed. Please take a look at:

https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html

This patchset if for net-next, so the subject should indicate that.
It is also normal to include a patch 0/X which explains the big
picture. Part of the commit message you have in patch 2/2 would then
appear in 0/2.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

    Andrew