[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJedcCw2DJWU=C0h_B093AofQw1nnDAQ8AaqVbhb=ea_mMNXWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 11:00:08 +0800
From: Zheng Hacker <hackerzheng666@...il.com>
To: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
Cc: Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com>, davem@...emloft.net,
linyunsheng@...wei.com, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 1395428693sheep@...il.com,
alex000young@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net: ravb: Fix possible UAF bug in ravb_remove
Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru> 于2023年3月13日周一 04:26写道:
>
> On 3/11/23 9:06 PM, Zheng Wang wrote:
>
> > In ravb_probe, priv->work was bound with ravb_tx_timeout_work.
> > If timeout occurs, it will start the work. And if we call
> > ravb_remove without finishing the work, there may be a
> > use-after-free bug on ndev.
> >
> > Fix it by finishing the job before cleanup in ravb_remove.
> >
> > Fixes: c156633f1353 ("Renesas Ethernet AVB driver proper")
> > Signed-off-by: Zheng Wang <zyytlz.wz@....com>
> > Reviewed-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
>
> Well, I haven't reviewed v3 yet...
Please forgive my rudeness, I forgot that..
> > ---
> > v3:
> > - fix typo in commit message
> > v2:
> > - stop dev_watchdog so that handle no more timeout work suggested by Yunsheng Lin,
> > add an empty line to make code clear suggested by Sergey Shtylyov
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > index 0f54849a3823..eb63ea788e19 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> > @@ -2892,6 +2892,10 @@ static int ravb_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > const struct ravb_hw_info *info = priv->info;
> >
> > + netif_carrier_off(ndev);
> > + netif_tx_disable(ndev);
> > + cancel_work_sync(&priv->work);
> > +
>
> Thinking about it again (and looking on some drivers): can ravb_remove() be
> called without ravb_close() having been called on the bound devices?
> So I suspect this code should be added to ravb_close()...
>
Yes, as this bug is found by static analysis, I've also seen a lot of
other drivers, many of them put the cancel-work-related code into
*_close as we must close all open file handle before remove a driver.
So I think you'are right. I'll try to add the code to ravb_close.
Best regards,
Zheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists