| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <000001d955cf$67e96300$37bc2900$@opensource.cirrus.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 17:15:24 +0000
From: Stefan Binding <sbinding@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: 'Amit Kumar Mahapatra' <amit.kumar-mahapatra@....com>,
<broonie@...nel.org>, <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
<richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>, <jic23@...nel.org>,
<tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>, <pratyush@...nel.org>,
<Sanju.Mehta@....com>, <chin-ting_kuo@...eedtech.com>,
<clg@...d.org>, <kdasu.kdev@...il.com>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
<rjui@...adcom.com>, <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
<eajames@...ux.ibm.com>, <olteanv@...il.com>, <han.xu@....com>,
<john.garry@...wei.com>, <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
<s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
<khilman@...libre.com>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<haibo.chen@....com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<daniel@...que.org>, <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
<robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>, <agross@...nel.org>,
<bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, <heiko@...ech.de>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>, <andi@...zian.org>,
<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
<wens@...e.org>, <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, <samuel@...lland.org>,
<masahisa.kojima@...aro.org>, <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>,
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<l.stelmach@...sung.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<alex.aring@...il.com>, <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>,
<kvalo@...nel.org>, <james.schulman@...rus.com>,
<david.rhodes@...rus.com>, <tanureal@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
<rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>, <perex@...ex.cz>, <tiwai@...e.com>,
<npiggin@...il.com>, <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
<mpe@...erman.id.au>, <oss@...error.net>, <windhl@....com>,
<yangyingliang@...wei.com>, <william.zhang@...adcom.com>,
<kursad.oney@...adcom.com>, <jonas.gorski@...il.com>,
<anand.gore@...adcom.com>, <rafal@...ecki.pl>
CC: <git@....com>, <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <joel@....id.au>,
<andrew@...id.au>, <radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro>,
<nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>,
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
<kernel@...gutronix.de>, <festevam@...il.com>, <linux-imx@....com>,
<jbrunet@...libre.com>, <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
<avifishman70@...il.com>, <tmaimon77@...il.com>,
<tali.perry1@...il.com>, <venture@...gle.com>, <yuenn@...gle.com>,
<benjaminfair@...gle.com>, <yogeshgaur.83@...il.com>,
<konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>, <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
<ldewangan@...dia.com>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
<jonathanh@...dia.com>, <michal.simek@....com>,
<linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org>,
<libertas-dev@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
<lars@...afoo.de>, <Michael.Hennerich@...log.com>,
<linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>, <michael@...le.cc>,
<palmer@...belt.com>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <amitrkcian2002@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V6 09/15] spi: Add stacked and parallel memories support in SPI core
Hi,
I tested this patch on an existing laptop which uses SPI with a GPIO
Chipselect,
(HP EliteBook 860 G9), and I get the error:
[ 2.671655] pxa2xx-spi pxa2xx-spi.2: chipselect 1 already in use
[ 2.671711] spi_master spi0: error -EBUSY: failed to add SPI device
CSC3551:00 from ACPI
[ 2.690903] Serial bus multi instantiate pseudo device driver:
probe of CSC3551:00 failed with error -16
Please don't merge this until we have fully investigated.
Thanks,
Stefan Binding
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-mahapatra@....com>
> Sent: 10 March 2023 17:32
> To: broonie@...nel.org; miquel.raynal@...tlin.com; richard@....at;
> vigneshr@...com; jic23@...nel.org; tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com;
> pratyush@...nel.org; Sanju.Mehta@....com; chin-
> ting_kuo@...eedtech.com; clg@...d.org; kdasu.kdev@...il.com;
> f.fainelli@...il.com; rjui@...adcom.com; sbranden@...adcom.com;
> eajames@...ux.ibm.com; olteanv@...il.com; han.xu@....com;
> john.garry@...wei.com; shawnguo@...nel.org;
> s.hauer@...gutronix.de; narmstrong@...libre.com;
> khilman@...libre.com; matthias.bgg@...il.com;
> haibo.chen@....com; linus.walleij@...aro.org; daniel@...que.org;
> haojian.zhuang@...il.com; robert.jarzmik@...e.fr;
> agross@...nel.org; bjorn.andersson@...aro.org; heiko@...ech.de;
> krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org; andi@...zian.org;
> mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com; alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com;
> wens@...e.org; jernej.skrabec@...il.com; samuel@...lland.org;
> masahisa.kojima@...aro.org; jaswinder.singh@...aro.org;
> rostedt@...dmis.org; mingo@...hat.com;
> l.stelmach@...sung.com; davem@...emloft.net;
> edumazet@...gle.com; kuba@...nel.org; pabeni@...hat.com;
> alex.aring@...il.com; stefan@...enfreihafen.org; kvalo@...nel.org;
> james.schulman@...rus.com; david.rhodes@...rus.com;
> tanureal@...nsource.cirrus.com; rf@...nsource.cirrus.com;
> perex@...ex.cz; tiwai@...e.com; npiggin@...il.com;
> christophe.leroy@...roup.eu; mpe@...erman.id.au;
> oss@...error.net; windhl@....com; yangyingliang@...wei.com;
> william.zhang@...adcom.com; kursad.oney@...adcom.com;
> jonas.gorski@...il.com; anand.gore@...adcom.com;
> rafal@...ecki.pl
> Cc: git@....com; linux-spi@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org; joel@....id.au; andrew@...id.au;
> radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro; nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com;
> alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com; claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com; bcm-
> kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com; fancer.lancer@...il.com;
> kernel@...gutronix.de; festevam@...il.com; linux-imx@....com;
> jbrunet@...libre.com; martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com;
> avifishman70@...il.com; tmaimon77@...il.com;
> tali.perry1@...il.com; venture@...gle.com; yuenn@...gle.com;
> benjaminfair@...gle.com; yogeshgaur.83@...il.com;
> konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org; alim.akhtar@...sung.com;
> ldewangan@...dia.com; thierry.reding@...il.com;
> jonathanh@...dia.com; michal.simek@....com; linux-
> aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org; openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
linux-
> amlogic@...ts.infradead.org; linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org;
linux-
> arm-msm@...r.kernel.org; linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org; linux-
> samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org; linux-stm32@...md-
> mailman.stormreply.com; linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev; linux-
> tegra@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> wpan@...r.kernel.org; libertas-dev@...ts.infradead.org; linux-
> wireless@...r.kernel.org; linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org;
> lars@...afoo.de; Michael.Hennerich@...log.com; linux-
> iio@...r.kernel.org; michael@...le.cc; palmer@...belt.com; linux-
> riscv@...ts.infradead.org; alsa-devel@...a-project.org;
> patches@...nsource.cirrus.com; linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org;
> amitrkcian2002@...il.com; amit.kumar-mahapatra@....com
> Subject: [PATCH V6 09/15] spi: Add stacked and parallel memories
> support in SPI core
>
> For supporting multiple CS the SPI device need to be aware of all
the
> CS
> values. So, the "chip_select" member in the spi_device structure is
> now an
> array that holds all the CS values.
>
> spi_device structure now has a "cs_index_mask" member. This acts as
> an
> index to the chip_select array. If nth bit of spi->cs_index_mask is
set
> then the driver would assert spi->chip_select[n].
>
> In parallel mode all the chip selects are asserted/de-asserted
> simultaneously and each byte of data is stored in both devices, the
> even
> bits in one, the odd bits in the other. The split is automatically
handled
> by the GQSPI controller. The GQSPI controller supports a maximum of
> two
> flashes connected in parallel mode. A "multi-cs-cap" flag is added
in
> the
> spi controntroller data, through ctlr->multi-cs-cap the spi core
will
> make
> sure that the controller is capable of handling multiple chip
selects at
> once.
>
> For supporting multiple CS via GPIO the cs_gpiod member of the
> spi_device
> structure is now an array that holds the gpio descriptor for each
> chipselect.
>
> Multi CS support using GPIO is not tested due to unavailability of
> necessary hardware setup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Kumar Mahapatra <amit.kumar-
> mahapatra@....com>
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi.c | 225
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> -
> include/linux/spi/spi.h | 34 ++++--
> 2 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> index c725b4bab7af..742bd688381c 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
> @@ -612,10 +612,17 @@ static int spi_dev_check(struct device *dev,
> void *data)
> {
> struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> struct spi_device *new_spi = data;
> -
> - if (spi->controller == new_spi->controller &&
> - spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0) == spi_get_chipselect(new_spi,
0))
> - return -EBUSY;
> + int idx, nw_idx;
> +
> + if (spi->controller == new_spi->controller) {
> + for (idx = 0; idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++) {
> + for (nw_idx = 0; nw_idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX;
> nw_idx++) {
> + if (spi_get_chipselect(spi, idx) ==
> + spi_get_chipselect(new_spi,
> nw_idx))
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -629,7 +636,7 @@ static int __spi_add_device(struct spi_device
> *spi)
> {
> struct spi_controller *ctlr = spi->controller;
> struct device *dev = ctlr->dev.parent;
> - int status;
> + int status, idx;
>
> /*
> * We need to make sure there's no other device with this
> @@ -638,8 +645,7 @@ static int __spi_add_device(struct spi_device
> *spi)
> */
> status = bus_for_each_dev(&spi_bus_type, NULL, spi,
> spi_dev_check);
> if (status) {
> - dev_err(dev, "chipselect %d already in use\n",
> - spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0));
> + dev_err(dev, "chipselect %d already in use\n",
> spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0));
> return status;
> }
>
> @@ -649,8 +655,10 @@ static int __spi_add_device(struct spi_device
> *spi)
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> - if (ctlr->cs_gpiods)
> - spi_set_csgpiod(spi, 0, ctlr-
> >cs_gpiods[spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0)]);
> + if (ctlr->cs_gpiods) {
> + for (idx = 0; idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++)
> + spi_set_csgpiod(spi, idx, ctlr-
> >cs_gpiods[spi_get_chipselect(spi, idx)]);
> + }
>
> /*
> * Drivers may modify this initial i/o setup, but will
> @@ -690,13 +698,15 @@ int spi_add_device(struct spi_device *spi)
> {
> struct spi_controller *ctlr = spi->controller;
> struct device *dev = ctlr->dev.parent;
> - int status;
> + int status, idx;
>
> - /* Chipselects are numbered 0..max; validate. */
> - if (spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0) >= ctlr->num_chipselect) {
> - dev_err(dev, "cs%d >= max %d\n",
> spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0),
> - ctlr->num_chipselect);
> - return -EINVAL;
> + for (idx = 0; idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++) {
> + /* Chipselects are numbered 0..max; validate. */
> + if (spi_get_chipselect(spi, idx) >= ctlr-
> >num_chipselect) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cs%d >= max %d\n",
> spi_get_chipselect(spi, idx),
> + ctlr->num_chipselect);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> }
>
> /* Set the bus ID string */
> @@ -713,12 +723,15 @@ static int spi_add_device_locked(struct
> spi_device *spi)
> {
> struct spi_controller *ctlr = spi->controller;
> struct device *dev = ctlr->dev.parent;
> + int idx;
>
> - /* Chipselects are numbered 0..max; validate. */
> - if (spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0) >= ctlr->num_chipselect) {
> - dev_err(dev, "cs%d >= max %d\n",
> spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0),
> - ctlr->num_chipselect);
> - return -EINVAL;
> + for (idx = 0; idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++) {
> + /* Chipselects are numbered 0..max; validate. */
> + if (spi_get_chipselect(spi, idx) >= ctlr-
> >num_chipselect) {
> + dev_err(dev, "cs%d >= max %d\n",
> spi_get_chipselect(spi, idx),
> + ctlr->num_chipselect);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> }
>
> /* Set the bus ID string */
> @@ -966,58 +979,119 @@ static void spi_res_release(struct
> spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_message *mes
> static void spi_set_cs(struct spi_device *spi, bool enable, bool
force)
> {
> bool activate = enable;
> + u32 cs_num = __ffs(spi->cs_index_mask);
> + int idx;
>
> /*
> - * Avoid calling into the driver (or doing delays) if the chip
> select
> - * isn't actually changing from the last time this was called.
> + * In parallel mode all the chip selects are
asserted/de-asserted
> + * at once
> */
> - if (!force && ((enable && spi->controller->last_cs ==
> spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0)) ||
> - (!enable && spi->controller->last_cs !=
> spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0))) &&
> - (spi->controller->last_cs_mode_high == (spi->mode &
> SPI_CS_HIGH)))
> - return;
> -
> - trace_spi_set_cs(spi, activate);
> -
> - spi->controller->last_cs = enable ? spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0)
: -
> 1;
> - spi->controller->last_cs_mode_high = spi->mode &
> SPI_CS_HIGH;
> -
> - if ((spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0) ||
!spi->controller->set_cs_timing)
> && !activate)
> - spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_hold, NULL);
> -
> - if (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)
> - enable = !enable;
> + if ((spi->cs_index_mask & SPI_PARALLEL_CS_MASK) ==
> SPI_PARALLEL_CS_MASK) {
> + spi->controller->last_cs_mode_high = spi->mode &
> SPI_CS_HIGH;
> +
> + if ((spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0) || !spi->controller-
> >set_cs_timing) && !activate)
> + spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_hold, NULL);
> +
> + if (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)
> + enable = !enable;
> +
> + if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0) && spi_get_csgpiod(spi,
1)) {
> + if (!(spi->mode & SPI_NO_CS)) {
> + /*
> + * Historically ACPI has no means of
the
> GPIO polarity and
> + * thus the SPISerialBus() resource
> defines it on the per-chip
> + * basis. In order to avoid a chain of
> negations, the GPIO
> + * polarity is considered being Active
> High. Even for the cases
> + * when _DSD() is involved (in the
> updated versions of ACPI)
> + * the GPIO CS polarity must be
> defined Active High to avoid
> + * ambiguity. That's why we use
> enable, that takes SPI_CS_HIGH
> + * into account.
> + */
> + if (has_acpi_companion(&spi->dev)) {
> + for (idx = 0; idx <
> SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++)
> +
> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi, idx),
> +
> !enable);
> + } else {
> + for (idx = 0; idx <
> SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++)
> + /* Polarity handled by
> GPIO library */
> +
> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi, idx),
> +
> activate);
> + }
> + }
> + /* Some SPI masters need both GPIO CS &
> slave_select */
> + if ((spi->controller->flags &
> SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS) &&
> + spi->controller->set_cs)
> + spi->controller->set_cs(spi, !enable);
> + else if (spi->controller->set_cs)
> + spi->controller->set_cs(spi, !enable);
> + }
>
> - if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0)) {
> - if (!(spi->mode & SPI_NO_CS)) {
> - /*
> - * Historically ACPI has no means of the GPIO
> polarity and
> - * thus the SPISerialBus() resource defines it
on
> the per-chip
> - * basis. In order to avoid a chain of
negations,
> the GPIO
> - * polarity is considered being Active High.
Even
> for the cases
> - * when _DSD() is involved (in the updated
> versions of ACPI)
> - * the GPIO CS polarity must be defined Active
> High to avoid
> - * ambiguity. That's why we use enable, that
> takes SPI_CS_HIGH
> - * into account.
> - */
> - if (has_acpi_companion(&spi->dev))
> -
> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0), !enable);
> - else
> - /* Polarity handled by GPIO library */
> -
> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0), activate);
> + for (idx = 0; idx < SPI_CS_CNT_MAX; idx++) {
> + if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, idx) ||
!spi->controller-
> >set_cs_timing) {
> + if (activate)
> + spi_delay_exec(&spi-
> >cs_setup, NULL);
> + else
> + spi_delay_exec(&spi-
> >cs_inactive, NULL);
> + }
> }
> - /* Some SPI masters need both GPIO CS &
> slave_select */
> - if ((spi->controller->flags & SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS) &&
> - spi->controller->set_cs)
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Avoid calling into the driver (or doing delays) if
the
> chip select
> + * isn't actually changing from the last time this was
> called.
> + */
> + if (!force && ((enable && spi->controller->last_cs ==
> + spi_get_chipselect(spi, cs_num)) ||
> + (!enable && spi->controller->last_cs
!=
> + spi_get_chipselect(spi, cs_num))) &&
> + (spi->controller->last_cs_mode_high ==
> + (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)))
> + return;
> +
> + trace_spi_set_cs(spi, activate);
> +
> + spi->controller->last_cs = enable ?
> spi_get_chipselect(spi, cs_num) : -1;
> + spi->controller->last_cs_mode_high = spi->mode &
> SPI_CS_HIGH;
> +
> + if ((spi_get_csgpiod(spi, cs_num) || !spi->controller-
> >set_cs_timing) && !activate)
> + spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_hold, NULL);
> +
> + if (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH)
> + enable = !enable;
> +
> + if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, cs_num)) {
> + if (!(spi->mode & SPI_NO_CS)) {
> + /*
> + * Historically ACPI has no means of
the
> GPIO polarity and
> + * thus the SPISerialBus() resource
> defines it on the per-chip
> + * basis. In order to avoid a chain of
> negations, the GPIO
> + * polarity is considered being Active
> High. Even for the cases
> + * when _DSD() is involved (in the
> updated versions of ACPI)
> + * the GPIO CS polarity must be
> defined Active High to avoid
> + * ambiguity. That's why we use
> enable, that takes SPI_CS_HIGH
> + * into account.
> + */
> + if (has_acpi_companion(&spi->dev))
> +
> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi, cs_num),
> +
> !enable);
> + else
> + /* Polarity handled by GPIO
> library */
> +
> gpiod_set_value_cansleep(spi_get_csgpiod(spi, cs_num),
> +
> activate);
> + }
> + /* Some SPI masters need both GPIO CS &
> slave_select */
> + if ((spi->controller->flags &
> SPI_MASTER_GPIO_SS) &&
> + spi->controller->set_cs)
> + spi->controller->set_cs(spi, !enable);
> + } else if (spi->controller->set_cs) {
> spi->controller->set_cs(spi, !enable);
> - } else if (spi->controller->set_cs) {
> - spi->controller->set_cs(spi, !enable);
> - }
> + }
>
> - if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0) ||
!spi->controller->set_cs_timing) {
> - if (activate)
> - spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_setup, NULL);
> - else
> - spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_inactive, NULL);
> + if (spi_get_csgpiod(spi, cs_num) || !spi->controller-
> >set_cs_timing) {
> + if (activate)
> + spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_setup,
> NULL);
> + else
> + spi_delay_exec(&spi->cs_inactive,
> NULL);
> + }
> }
> }
>
> @@ -2246,8 +2320,8 @@ static void of_spi_parse_dt_cs_delay(struct
> device_node *nc,
> static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct spi_controller *ctlr, struct
spi_device
> *spi,
> struct device_node *nc)
> {
> - u32 value;
> - int rc;
> + u32 value, cs[SPI_CS_CNT_MAX] = {0};
> + int rc, idx;
>
> /* Mode (clock phase/polarity/etc.) */
> if (of_property_read_bool(nc, "spi-cpha"))
> @@ -2320,13 +2394,21 @@ static int of_spi_parse_dt(struct
> spi_controller *ctlr, struct spi_device *spi,
> }
>
> /* Device address */
> - rc = of_property_read_u32(nc, "reg", &value);
> - if (rc) {
> + rc = of_property_read_variable_u32_array(nc, "reg", &cs[0], 1,
> + SPI_CS_CNT_MAX);
> + if (rc < 0 || rc > ctlr->num_chipselect) {
> dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "%pOF has no valid 'reg' property
> (%d)\n",
> nc, rc);
> return rc;
> + } else if ((of_property_read_bool(nc, "parallel-memories"))
> &&
> + (!ctlr->multi_cs_cap)) {
> + dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "SPI controller doesn't support
> multi CS\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
> - spi_set_chipselect(spi, 0, value);
> + for (idx = 0; idx < rc; idx++)
> + spi_set_chipselect(spi, idx, cs[idx]);
> + /* By default set the spi->cs_index_mask as 1 */
> + spi->cs_index_mask = 0x01;
>
> /* Device speed */
> if (!of_property_read_u32(nc, "spi-max-frequency", &value))
> @@ -3846,6 +3928,7 @@ static int __spi_validate(struct spi_device
> *spi, struct spi_message *message)
> struct spi_controller *ctlr = spi->controller;
> struct spi_transfer *xfer;
> int w_size;
> + u32 cs_num = __ffs(spi->cs_index_mask);
>
> if (list_empty(&message->transfers))
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -3858,7 +3941,7 @@ static int __spi_validate(struct spi_device
> *spi, struct spi_message *message)
> * cs_change is set for each transfer.
> */
> if ((spi->mode & SPI_CS_WORD) && (!(ctlr->mode_bits &
> SPI_CS_WORD) ||
> - spi_get_csgpiod(spi, 0))) {
> + spi_get_csgpiod(spi,
> cs_num))) {
> size_t maxsize;
> int ret;
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi.h b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> index bdb35a91b4bf..452682aa1a39 100644
> --- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> +++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
> @@ -19,6 +19,11 @@
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/u64_stats_sync.h>
>
> +/* Max no. of CS supported per spi device */
> +#define SPI_CS_CNT_MAX 2
> +
> +/* chip select mask */
> +#define SPI_PARALLEL_CS_MASK (BIT(0) | BIT(1))
> struct dma_chan;
> struct software_node;
> struct ptp_system_timestamp;
> @@ -166,6 +171,7 @@ extern void
> spi_transfer_cs_change_delay_exec(struct spi_message *msg,
> * deasserted. If @cs_change_delay is used from @spi_transfer,
> then the
> * two delays will be added up.
> * @pcpu_statistics: statistics for the spi_device
> + * @cs_index_mask: Bit mask of the active chipselect(s) in the
> chipselect array
> *
> * A @spi_device is used to interchange data between an SPI slave
> * (usually a discrete chip) and CPU memory.
> @@ -181,7 +187,7 @@ struct spi_device {
> struct spi_controller *controller;
> struct spi_controller *master; /* Compatibility layer
> */
> u32 max_speed_hz;
> - u8 chip_select;
> + u8 chip_select[SPI_CS_CNT_MAX];
> u8 bits_per_word;
> bool rt;
> #define SPI_NO_TX BIT(31) /* No transmit wire */
> @@ -202,7 +208,7 @@ struct spi_device {
> void *controller_data;
> char modalias[SPI_NAME_SIZE];
> const char *driver_override;
> - struct gpio_desc *cs_gpiod; /* Chip select gpio
desc
> */
> + struct gpio_desc *cs_gpiod[SPI_CS_CNT_MAX]; /*
Chip
> select gpio desc */
> struct spi_delay word_delay; /* Inter-word delay */
> /* CS delays */
> struct spi_delay cs_setup;
> @@ -212,6 +218,13 @@ struct spi_device {
> /* The statistics */
> struct spi_statistics __percpu *pcpu_statistics;
>
> + /* Bit mask of the chipselect(s) that the driver need to use
> from
> + * the chipselect array.When the controller is capable to
handle
> + * multiple chip selects & memories are connected in parallel
> + * then more than one bit need to be set in cs_index_mask.
> + */
> + u32 cs_index_mask : 2;
> +
> /*
> * likely need more hooks for more protocol options affecting
> how
> * the controller talks to each chip, like:
> @@ -268,22 +281,22 @@ static inline void *spi_get_drvdata(struct
> spi_device *spi)
>
> static inline u8 spi_get_chipselect(struct spi_device *spi, u8 idx)
> {
> - return spi->chip_select;
> + return spi->chip_select[idx];
> }
>
> static inline void spi_set_chipselect(struct spi_device *spi, u8
idx, u8
> chipselect)
> {
> - spi->chip_select = chipselect;
> + spi->chip_select[idx] = chipselect;
> }
>
> static inline struct gpio_desc *spi_get_csgpiod(struct spi_device
*spi,
> u8 idx)
> {
> - return spi->cs_gpiod;
> + return spi->cs_gpiod[idx];
> }
>
> static inline void spi_set_csgpiod(struct spi_device *spi, u8 idx,
struct
> gpio_desc *csgpiod)
> {
> - spi->cs_gpiod = csgpiod;
> + spi->cs_gpiod[idx] = csgpiod;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -388,6 +401,8 @@ extern struct spi_device
> *spi_new_ancillary_device(struct spi_device *spi, u8 ch
> * @bus_lock_spinlock: spinlock for SPI bus locking
> * @bus_lock_mutex: mutex for exclusion of multiple callers
> * @bus_lock_flag: indicates that the SPI bus is locked for
exclusive
> use
> + * @multi_cs_cap: indicates that the SPI Controller can assert/de-
> assert
> + * more than one chip select at once.
> * @setup: updates the device mode and clocking records used by a
> * device's SPI controller; protocol code may call this. This
> * must fail if an unrecognized or unsupported mode is
> requested.
> @@ -585,6 +600,13 @@ struct spi_controller {
> /* Flag indicating that the SPI bus is locked for exclusive
use */
> bool bus_lock_flag;
>
> + /*
> + * Flag indicating that the spi-controller has multi chip
select
> + * capability and can assert/de-assert more than one chip
> select
> + * at once.
> + */
> + bool multi_cs_cap;
> +
> /* Setup mode and clock, etc (spi driver may call many times).
> *
> * IMPORTANT: this may be called when transfers to another
> --
> 2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists