netdev - [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add various tests to check helper access into ptr_to_btf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20230313235845.61029-4-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Mar 2023 16:58:45 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net
Cc:     daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...nel.org,
        void@...ifault.com, davemarchevsky@...a.com, tj@...nel.org,
        memxor@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add various tests to check helper access into ptr_to_btf_id.

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>

Add various tests to check helper access into ptr_to_btf_id.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c  | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c  |  4 +++
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c
index 002c7f69e47f..27994d6b2914 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_failure.c
@@ -301,3 +301,39 @@ int BPF_PROG(task_kfunc_from_lsm_task_free, struct task_struct *task)
 	bpf_task_release(acquired);
 	return 0;
 }
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("access beyond the end of member comm")
+int BPF_PROG(task_access_comm1, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+	bpf_strncmp(task->comm, 17, "foo");
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("access beyond the end of member comm")
+int BPF_PROG(task_access_comm2, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+	bpf_strncmp(task->comm + 1, 16, "foo");
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
+__failure __msg("write into memory")
+int BPF_PROG(task_access_comm3, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags)
+{
+	bpf_probe_read_kernel(task->comm, 16, task->comm);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("fentry/__set_task_comm")
+__failure __msg("R1 type=ptr_ expected")
+int BPF_PROG(task_access_comm4, struct task_struct *task, const char *buf, bool exec)
+{
+	/*
+	 * task->comm is a legacy ptr_to_btf_id. The verifier cannot guarantee
+	 * its safety. Hence it cannot be accessed with normal load insns.
+	 */
+	bpf_strncmp(task->comm, 16, "foo");
+	return 0;
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c
index aebc4bb14e7d..4f61596b0242 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_kfunc_success.c
@@ -207,6 +207,10 @@ int BPF_PROG(test_task_from_pid_invalid, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_fla
 	if (!is_test_kfunc_task())
 		return 0;
 
+	bpf_strncmp(task->comm, 12, "foo");
+	bpf_strncmp(task->comm, 16, "foo");
+	bpf_strncmp(&task->comm[8], 4, "foo");
+
 	if (is_pid_lookup_valid(-1)) {
 		err = 1;
 		return 0;
-- 
2.34.1