[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBCh98lGvhlMKQQp@corigine.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 17:33:59 +0100
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Neeraj sanjay kale <neeraj.sanjaykale@....com>
Cc: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"marcel@...tmann.org" <marcel@...tmann.org>,
"johan.hedberg@...il.com" <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
"luiz.dentz@...il.com" <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"jirislaby@...nel.org" <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
"alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com" <alok.a.tiwari@...cle.com>,
"hdanton@...a.com" <hdanton@...a.com>,
"ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com" <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
"leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org" <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Amitkumar Karwar <amitkumar.karwar@....com>,
Rohit Fule <rohit.fule@....com>,
Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/3] Bluetooth: NXP: Add protocol support for NXP
Bluetooth chipsets
On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 03:40:34PM +0000, Neeraj sanjay kale wrote:
> Hi Simon
>
> Thank you for reviewing the patch. I have a comment below:
>
> >
> > > +send_skb:
> > > + /* Prepend skb with frame type */
> > > + memcpy(skb_push(skb, 1), &hci_skb_pkt_type(skb), 1);
> > > + skb_queue_tail(&nxpdev->txq, skb);
> > > +
> > > + btnxpuart_tx_wakeup(nxpdev);
> > > +ret:
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > +free_skb:
> > > + kfree_skb(skb);
> > > + goto ret;
> >
> > nit: I think it would be nicer to simply return 0 here.
> > And remove the ret label entirely.
> >
> > > +}
> >
> We need to return from this function without clearing the skbs, unless "goto free_skb" is called.
> If I remove the ret label and return after kfree_skb() it causes a kernel crash.
> Keeping this change as it is.
>
> Please let me know if you have any further review comments on the v11 patch.
I'll look over v11.
But for the record, I meant something like this:
send_skb:
/* Prepend skb with frame type */
memcpy(skb_push(skb, 1), &hci_skb_pkt_type(skb), 1);
skb_queue_tail(&nxpdev->txq, skb);
btnxpuart_tx_wakeup(nxpdev);
return 0;
free_skb:
kfree_skb(skb);
return 0;
}
> We need to return from this function without clearing the skbs, unless "goto free_skb" is called.
> If I remove the ret label and return after kfree_skb() it causes a kernel crash.
> Keeping this change as it is.
>
> Please let me know if you have any further review comments on the v11 patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists